Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:57:59.847Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The statistical analysis of data from intercropping experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. C. Pearce  and
B. Gilliver
S. C. Pearce
Affiliation:
Mathematical Institute, University of Kent at Canterbury, England
B. Gilliver
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

When two species are interplanted the interpretation of experimental data presents statistical difficulties because the yields of the two crops will not in general be independent. It is therefore desirable to have a method that will both allow significance levels to be determined and give full importance to the treatment means of the two crops. It is shown that a bivariate analysis of variance can be carried out with little difficulty and precise tests can be based upon it. If it would be helpful to combine the two crops in any way, e.g. on the basis of calorific value or price, the task is readily accomplished.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , December 1978 , pp. 625 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrew, D. J. (1972). Intercropping with sorghum in Nigeria. Experimental Agriculture 8, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, E. F. I. & Yusuf, Y. (1976). Eesearch with mixed crops at the Institute for Agricultural Research, Samaru, Nigeria. Symposium on Intercropping in Semi-Arid Conditions, Tanzania, 1976.Google Scholar
de Wit, C. T. (1960). On competition. Verslagen van landbouwkundige onderzoekingen, 66.8, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1970). Studies of intercropping, I. Maize or sorghum with groundnuts. East African Agriculture and Forestry Journal 26, 1–10.Google Scholar
Finney, D. J. (1956). Multivariate analysis and agricultural experiments. Biometrics 12, 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGilchrist, C. E. & Trenbath, B. R. (1971). A revised analysis of plant competition experiments. Biometrics 27, 659–672.Google Scholar
Okigbo, B. N. & Greenland, D. J. (1977). Mixed intercropping and related cropping systems in tropical Africa. American Society of Agronomy Special Publication No. 27.Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1952). Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometric Research. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. (1955). An analysis of perennial crop data. Biometrics 11, 201–212.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. S. (1932). Certain generalizations in the analysis of variance. Biometrika 24, 471–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Osiru, D. S. O. (1972). Studies on mixtures of maize and beans with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 519–529.Google Scholar