Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T02:57:12.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soil physical environment affecting root growth of upland rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. Kar ,
S. B. Varade  and
B. P. Ghildyal
S. Kar
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-121302, India
S. B. Varade
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-121302, India
B. P. Ghildyal
Affiliation:
Agricultural Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-121302, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Root growth of rice (Oryza saliva L.) is frequentlyinhibited by an adverse physical environment resulting from high moisture stress and strength of soilunder upland conditions, and the effects are often reflected in poor performance of the crop. This necessitates a critical understanding of rice root growth under varying soil physical conditions.

The growth responses of the rice root system to the interaction between moisture regime and bulk density of soil as well as to the induced soil physical characteristics were assessed under controlled glasshouse conditions. Four moisture regimes: 0 (M1), 0–20 (M2), 0–350(M3), and 350–10000 (M4) mb, were superimposed on low, medium and high bulk density treatments in clay, loam and sandy loam soils. The soil physical environment was characterized by measurements of moisture distribution, penetrationenergy and oxygen diffusion rate in soils as functions of depth.

A low moisture stress of 20 mb in low density soils favoured rice root growth. In low density soils, even though the number of roots at the base (proximal end) was maximum under M1, the depth of penetration, volume and dry weight of root were significantly more underM2 than under M1; M3 and M4. Irrespective of bulk density, even though oxygen diffusion rates in soils under M3 and M4 were greater than those under M1 and M2, the number of roots at the base, volume and dry weight of the root system decreased under M3 and M4 owing to low moisture content and high penetration energy in the surface layer (0–5 cm) of all the soil types. Lower moisture content and higher penetration energy at higher bulk densities of the soil types significantly reduced the root growth and especially the depth of penetration.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 719 - 726
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kae, S. & Varade, S. B. (1972). Influence of mechanical impedance on rice seedling root growth. Agronomy Journal 64, 80–81.Google Scholar
Kae, S., Varade, S. B., Stjbramanyam, T. K. & Ghtldyal, B. P. (1976). Soil physical conditions affecting rice root growth. I. Bulk density and submerged soil temperature regime effects. Agronomy Journal 68, 23–26.Google Scholar
Ktjmab, V., Mahajan, K. T., Ghildyal, B. P. & Vabadb, S. B. (1971). A new penetrometer for easy evaluation of soil strength. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 19, 227–230.Google Scholar
Letey, J. & Stolzy, L. H. (1964). Measurement of oxygen diffusion rates with the platinum microelectrode. I. Hilgardia 35, 545–554.Google Scholar
REICOSKY, D. C., Millington, R. J., Kltjte, A. & Petees, T. B. (1972). Patterns of water uptake and root distribution of soybeans in the presence of a water table. Agronomy Journal 64, 292–297.Google Scholar
Scott, T. W. & Ebiokson, A. E. (1964). Effect of aeration and mechanical impedance on the root development of alfalfa, sugarbeet and tomato. Agronomy Journal 56, 575–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar