Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vsgnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:17:22.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Single value” soil properties: a study of the significance of certain soil constants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. A. Keen  and
J. R. H. Coutts
B. A. Keen
Affiliation:
Soil Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station
J. R. H. Coutts
Affiliation:
Soil Physics Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Numerous attempts have been made to devise an experimental method that, applied to a variety or a series of soils, enables them to be placed in an order closely reflecting their field behaviour or their most important physical characteristics. They are called “single-value” determinations as they endeavour to specify the soil by a single number, in distinction to the group of figures obtained, for example, from a mechanical analysis. A number of these methods are discussed in the present paper which contains an account of a detailed investigation on 39 soils of certain single value determinations.

The methods selected for study were chosen because (i) they required only simple apparatus, and (ii) they appeared to be related to some distinct soil characteristic.

The list of measurements was as follows:

Percentage of clay.

Moisture content of soil in equilibrium with atmosphere of 50 per cent, relative humidity (the ordinary “air-dry moisture content” which was also determined, is close to this value).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , October 1928 , pp. 740 - 765
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Robinson, G. W. (1922). J. Agric. Sci. 12, 287–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2 a)Sub-committee of the A.E.A. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 123–44. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2 b)Sub-committee of the A.E.A. (1926). Agric. Progress, 3, 106–9.Google Scholar
(2 c)Sub-committee of the A.E.A. (1928). Agric. Progress, 5, 137–44.Google Scholar
(3 a)Proc. First Int. Congress Soil Sci. (Washington). (In the press.)Google Scholar
(3 b)Keen, B. A. (1928). Soil Research, 1, 43–9.Google Scholar
(4)Odén, S. (1915). Int. Mitt. Bodenk. 5, 257–311.Google Scholar
(5)Coutts, J. R. H. and Crowther, E. M. (1925). Trans. Faraday Soc. 21, 374–80. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6 a)Keen, B. A. (1920). J. Agric. Sci. 10, 44–71. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 10.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6 b)Keen, B. A.(1922). Trans. Faraday Soc. 17, 228–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6 c)Keen, B. A.(1926). Physics in Industry (Inst, of Physics), 4, 29–63. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.)Google Scholar
(7)Fisher, E. A. (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Joffe, J. S. and McLean, H. C. (1925). Soil Sci. 20, 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9 a)Ashley, H. E. (1909). U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 388.Google Scholar
(9 b)Gile, P. L., et al. (1924). U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull. 1193.Google Scholar
(9 c)Wilkinson, J. A. and Hoff, W. (1925). J. Phys. Chem. 29, 808–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10 a)Muntz, A. and Gaudechon, H. (1909). Ann. Sci. Agron. (3rd ser.), 4, 393–443.Google Scholar
(10 b)Bouyoucos, G. J. (1925). Soil Sci. 19, 152–61.Google Scholar
(11 a)Tempany, H. A. (1917). J. Agric. Sci. 8, 312–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11 b)Hardy, F. (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11 c)Haines, W. B. (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 296–310. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Hardy, F. (1923). J. Agric. Sci. 13, 340–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13 a)Puri, A. N., Crowther, E. M. and Keen, B. A. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 68–88. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13 b)Puri, A. N. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 272–83. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13 c)Crowther, E. M. and Puri, A. N. (1924). Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 106, 232–42. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)Google Scholar
(14)Alway, F. J. (1913). Nebraska Expt. Sta. Res. Bull. 3.Google Scholar
(15)Shull, C. A. (1916). Bot. Gaz. 62, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Cameron, F. K. and Gallagher, F. E. (1908). U.S. Bureau of Soils Bull. 50.Google Scholar
(17)Shaw, C. F. (1927). Soil Sci. 23, 303–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18)Keen, B. A., Crowther, E. M. and Coutts, J. R. H. (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 105–22. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(19)Haines, W. B. (1925 and 1927). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 529–35; 17, 264–90. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Fisher, R. A. (1926 and 1928). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 492–505. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 13.) 18, 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(21)Keen, B.A. and Raczkowski, H. (1921). J. Agric. Sci. 11, 441–49. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 11.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(22)Marchand, B. de C. (1926). South African J. Sci. 23, 238–43.Google Scholar
(23)Keen, B. A. (1924). J. Agric. Sci. 14, 170–7. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Hardy, F. (1928). J. Agric. Sci. 18, 252–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Wilsdon, B. H. (1921). Mem. Dept. Agric. India, Chem. Series, 6, 154–84.Google Scholar
(26)Haines, W. B. (1925). J. Agric. Sci. 15, 178–200. (Rothamsted Memoirs, 12.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar