Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:20:25.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A simple technique for the short-term storage of pollen of a dihaploid-inducing diploid potato clone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. J. De Maine
Affiliation:
Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian

Summary

Two methods of storing pollen of the dihaploid-inducing Dutch (Wageningen) Solatum phureja clone, IVP 48, are described. Pollination results showed that the functional fertility of one type of stored pollen is similar to that of fresh pollen when used in dihaploid induction crosses on tetraploid potatoes. No obvious relationship was found between the in vitro germination of the pollen samples and their functional fertilities in dihaploid induction crosses.

Type
Short Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blomquist, A. W. & Lauer, F. I. (1962). A simplified technique for handling and storing potato pollen. American Potato Journal 39, 340–3.Google Scholar
Dyer, A. F. (1966). Pollen tube mitosis in culture: osmotic control and acenaphthene treatment. Stain Technology 41, 277–80.Google Scholar
Harrington, J. F. (1970). Seed and pollen storage for conservation of plant gene resources, (ed. Frankel, O. H. and Bennett, E.), Genetic Resources in Plants: Their Exploration and Conservation, pp. 501–21. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Howard, H. W. (1968). The storage of potato pollen. American Potato Journal 35, 676–8.Google Scholar
Janssen, A. W. B. & Hermsen, J. G. Th. (1976). Estimating pollen fertility in Solanum species and haploids. Euphytica 25, 577–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. R. (1955). Irish potato pollen storage. American Potato Journal 32, 460–6.Google Scholar