Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Sensitivity of weed emergence and dynamics to life-traits of annual spring-emerging weeds in contrasting cropping systems, using weed beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) as an example

  • N. COLBACH (a1), B. CHAUVEL (a1), H. DARMENCY (a1) and Y. TRICAULT (a1)

Summary

Cropping systems contain a diverse multi-species weed flora including several species that cross-breed with and/or descend from crops, including weed beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris). The effects of cropping systems on this weed flora are complex because of their large range of variation and their numerous interactions with climate and soil conditions. In order to study and quantify the long-term effects of cropping system components (crop succession and cultural techniques) on weed population dynamics, a biophysical process-based model called GENESYS-Beet has previously been developed for weed beet. In the present paper, the model was modified to remove the crop–weed connection and employed to identify and rank the weed life-traits as a function of their effect on weed emergence timing and density as well as on weed densities at plant, adult and seed bank stages, using a global sensitivity analysis to model parameters. A similar method has already been used with the complete GENESYS-Beet model (i.e. including the crop–weed connection) based on Monte Carlo simulations with simultaneous randomization of all life-trait parameters and run in three cropping systems differing in their risk of infestation by weed beet. Simulated weed emergence timing and density, as well as surviving plant, adult and seed bank densities, were then analysed with regression models as a function of model parameters to rank life-cycle processes and related life-traits and quantify their effects. The comparison of the present, crop-independent results to those of the previous, crop-dependent study showed that the crop-relative weed beet can be considered as a typical crop-independent spring weed as long as no traits conferring a selective advantage are inherited and in rotations where crops favouring weed emergence and reproduction are frequent. In such rotations, advice for controlling the crop-relative and the crop-independent weed is more or less identical. The rarer these favourable crops, the more important pre-emergence processes become for the crop-independent weed; management advice should thus focus more on seed bank survival and seedling emergence. For the crop-relative, post-emergence processes become dominant because of the increasing necessity for a new population founding event; management advice should mostly concern the avoidance of crop bolters. In both studies, the key parameters were more or less the same, i.e. those determining the timing and success of growth, development, seed maturation and the physiological end of seed production. Timing parameters were usually more important than success parameters, showing for instance that optimal timing of weed management operations is often more important than its exact efficacy. Comparison with previous sensitivity analyses carried out for autumn-emerging weed species showed that some of the present conclusions are probably specific to spring-emerging weed species only. For autumn-emerging species, pre-emergence traits would be more important. In the rotations with frequent favourable crops and insufficient weed control, interactions between traits were small, indicating that diverse populations and species with contrasting traits could prosper, potentially leading to a diverse multi-species weed flora. Conversely, when favourable crops were rare and weed control optimal, traits had little impact individually, indicating that a small number of optimal combinations of traits would be successful, thus limiting both intra- and inter-specific variability.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*To whom all correspondence should be addressed. INRA, UMR Biologie et Gestion des Adventices, BP 86510, 21065 Dijon Cedex, France, Email: Nathalie.Colbach@dijon.inra.fr

References

Hide All
Bhowmik, P. C. (1997). Weed biology: importance to weed management. Weed Science 45, 349356.
Chauvel, B., Guillemin, J. P. & Colbach, N. (2009). Evolution of a herbicide-resistant population of Alopecurus myosuroides Huds. in a long-term cropping system experiment. Crop Protection 28, 343349.
Chauvel, B., Guillemin, J. P., Colbach, N. & Gasquez, J. (2001). Evaluation of cropping systems for management of herbicide-resistant populations of blackgrass (Alopecurus myosuroides Huds.). Crop Protection 20, 127137.
Chicouene, D. (2007). Mechanical destruction of weeds. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 27, 1927.
Clements, D. R., Weise, S. F. & Swanton, C. J. (1994). Integrated weed management and weed species diversity. Phytoprotection 75, 118.
Colbach, N., Darmency, H. & Tricault, Y. (2010). Identifying key life traits for the dynamics and gene flow in a weedy crop relative: sensitivity analysis of the GeneSys simulation model for weed beet. Ecological Modelling 221, 225237.
Colbach, N. & Debaeke, P. (1998). Integrating crop management and crop rotation effects into models of weed population dynamics: a review. Weed Science 46, 717728.
Colbach, N., Molinari, N. & Clermont-Dauphin, C. (2004). Sensitivity analyses for a model simulating demography and genotype evolutions with time. Application to GENESYS modelling gene flow between rapeseed varieties and volunteers. Ecological Modelling 179, 91113.
Debaeke, P. & Orlando, D. (1991). Simplification du travail du sol et évolution de la flore adventice: conséquences pour le désherbage à l’échelle de la rotation. In Simplification du travail du sol (Eds Monnier, G., Thévenet, G. & Lesaffre, B.), pp. 3562. Paris: INRA.
Forcella, F., Benech-Arnold, R. L., Sanchez, R. & Ghersa, C. M. (2000). Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Research 67, 123139.
Fried, G., Norton, L. R. & Reboud, X. (2008). Environmental and management factors determining weed species composition and diversity in France. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 128, 6876.
Gasquez, J., Mouemar, A. L., Bouvard, E., Matejicek, A. & Barralis, G. (1984). Polymorphisme phénotypique d'une population de Chenopodium album L. au cours d'une rotation en présence ou non d'herbicides. In VIIe Colloque International sur l'Ecologie, la Biologie et la Systématique des Mauvaises Herbes, pp. 257262. Paris, France: COLUMA EWRS.
Holst, N., Rasmussen, I. A. & Bastiaans, L. (2007). Field weed population dynamics: a review of model approaches and applications. Weed Research 47, 114.
Hornsey, K. G. & Arnold, M. H. (1979). The origin of weed beet. Annals of Applied Biology 92, 279285.
Kegode, G. O. & Forcella, F. (2006). Tillage effect on reproductive output by foxtails cohorts in corn and soybean. Weed Science 54, 419427.
Kon, K. F., Follas, G. B. & James, D. E. (2007). Seed dormancy and germination phenology of grass weeds and implications for their control in cereals. New Zealand Plant Protection 60, 174182.
Kurstjens, D. A. G. & Kropff, M. J. (2001). The impact of uprooting and soil-covering on the effectiveness of weed harrowing. Weed Research 41, 211228.
Saltelli, A., Chan, K. & Scott, E. M. (2000). Sensitivity Analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
SAS Institute (1999–2000). SASETS User's Guide, Version 8. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Scursoni, J. A., Forcella, F. & Gunsolus, J. (2007). Weed escapes and delayed weed emergence in glyphosate resistant-soybean. Crop Protection 26, 212218.
Sester, M., Delanoy, M., Colbach, N. & Darmency, H. (2004). Crop and density effects on weed beet growth and reproduction. Weed Research 44, 5059.
Sester, M., Dürr, C., Darmency, H. & Colbach, N. (2006). Evolution of weed beet (Beta vulgaris L.) seed bank: quantification of seed survival, dormancy, germination and pre-emergence growth. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 1925.
Sester, M., Dürr, C., Darmency, H. & Colbach, N. (2007). Modelling the effects of cropping systems on the seed bank dynamics and the emergence of weed beet. Ecological Modelling 204, 4758.
Sester, M., Tricault, Y., Darmency, H. & Colbach, N. (2008). GENESYS-Beet: a model of the effects of cropping systems on gene flow between sugar beet and weed beet. Field crops Research 107, 245256.
Teasdale, J. R., Mangum, R. W., Radhakrishnan, J. & Cavigelli, M. A. (2004). Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 96, 14291435.
Tricault, Y., Darmency, H. & Colbach, N. (2009). Identifying key components of weed beet management using sensitivity analyses of the GeneSys-Beet model in GM sugar beet. Weed Research 49, 581591.
Van Acker, R. C. (2009). Weed biology serves practical weed management. Weed Research 49, 15.
Violle, C., Navas, M.-L., Vile, D., Kazakou, E., Fortunel, C., Hummel, I. & Garnier, E. (2007). Let the concept of trait be functional! Oikos 116, 882892.
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Colbach Supplementary Materials
Colbach Electronic Annex

 Word (445 KB)
445 KB

Sensitivity of weed emergence and dynamics to life-traits of annual spring-emerging weeds in contrasting cropping systems, using weed beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. vulgaris) as an example

  • N. COLBACH (a1), B. CHAUVEL (a1), H. DARMENCY (a1) and Y. TRICAULT (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed