Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T23:12:36.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rothamsted irrigation 1964–76

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. K. French  and
B. J. Legg
B. K. French
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
B. J. Legg
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A series of irrigation experiments was done at Rothamsted where the soil is a flinty silty clay loam over flinty clay. The results are compared with those obtained by Penman (1962, 1970, 1971) at Woburn where the soil is a loamy sand over sand. The limiting deficits, Di, above which irrigation increased yields, were about 2·5 times greater at Rothamsted than at Woburn; this ratio approximates to the ratio of the water-holding capacities of the soils (– 0·1 to – 15 bar) to a depth of 1 m. The limiting deficits at Rothamsted were 80 mm for spring-sown field beans, 84 mm for main-crop potatoes, 100 mm for spring barley and 140 mm for spring and winter wheat. The responses to irrigation were not determined accurately as there were few years with a large response for any crop. However, the evidence is that the maximum response that could be expected for potatoes was 0·19 t/ha/mm water, and for grain dry matter of beans 0·006 t/ha/mm. The figure for potatoes agrees with that obtained by Penman at Woburn; the response of beans was much smaller at Rothamsted, partly because of severe attacks of broad bean stain virus.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 15 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Development and Advisory Services (1972). Results of Experiments at the Experimental Husbandry Farms, 1972, no. 20, part II. Potatoes, pp. 1–5. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, London.Google Scholar
Avery, B. W. (1964). District around Aylesbury and Hemel Hempstead. Memoir of the Soil Survey of England and Wales. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Catt, J. A., King, D. W. & Weir, A. H. (1975). The soils of Woburn Experimental Farm. 1. Great Hill, Road Piece and Bull Close. Report, Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1974, part 2, pp. 5–28.Google Scholar
Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawlor, D. W. & De, C.Jeffers, W. (1978). A drought experiment using mobile shelters: the effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Durrant, M. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. III. Water consumption. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 277–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draycott, A. P. & Webb, D. J. (1971). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer, plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. I. Yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, B. K., Long, I. F. & Penman, H. L. (1973). Water use by farm crops. I. Test of the neutron meter on barley, beans and sugar beet, 1970. II. Spring wheat, barley, potatoes (1969); potatoes, beans, kale (1968). III. Bare soil, short turf and crops in rotation, 1962 to 1967, 1971. Report, Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1972, part 2, pp. 5–43,43–61, 62–85.Google Scholar
Gasser, J. K. R. & Thorburn, M. A. P. (1972). The growth, composition and nutrient uptake of spring wheat. Effects of fertilizer-N, irrigation and CCC on dry matter and N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Na. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, P. M. (1972). The effect of plant population and irrigation on sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. (1976). Soil Survey Field Handbook. Soil Survey Technical Monograph no. 5, Harpenden.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1970). Evapotranspiration from barley grown at different plant densities. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 445–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapwood, D. H., Wellings, L. W. & Hawkins, J. H. (1973). Irrigation as a practical means to control potato common scab (Streptomyces scabies); final experiment and conclusions. Plant Pathology 22, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Brown, N. J. & Smith, G. J. (1978). Small plots and automatic rain shelters: a field appraisal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 321–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, I. F. & French, B. K. (1967). Measurement of soil moisture in the field by neutron moderation. Journal of Soil Science 18, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn Irrigation, 1951–59. I. Purpose, design and weather. II. Results for grass. III. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 343–348; 349–364; 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1970). Woburn irrigation, 1960–68. IV. Design and interpretation. V. Results for leys. VI. Results for rotation crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 69–73; 75–88; 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1971). Irrigation at Woburn–VII. Report, Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1970, part 2, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. & Burnett, E. (1971). Dryland evaporative flux in a subhumid climate: II. Plant influences. Agronomy Journal 63, 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, D. A. (1968). Water movement in porous materials. III. Evaporation of water from soil. British Journal of Applied Physics (Journal Physics D) Series 2, 1, 1779–1791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1975). Simple non-linear modelling for the general user. Proceedings of the 40th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Warsaw 2, 585–593.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Goode, J. E. (1967). Crop Responses to Water at Different Stages of Growth. Research Review no. 2. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A. & Jackson, M. B. (1973). Ethylene, waterlogging and plant growth. Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report 1973, pp. 60–75.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. B. & Jury, W. A. (1976). Estimating evaporation and transpiration from a row crop during incomplete cover. Agronomy Journal 68, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, A. S. & Oliver, H. R. (1977). On Penman's equation for estimating regional evaporation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 103, 345–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellings, L. W. (1972). The effect of seed rate, nitrogen and irrigation on the yield of Pentland Crown potatoes. Experimental Husbandry, London 22, 39–50.Google Scholar
Wellings, L. W. (1973). The effect of irrigation on the yield and quality of maincrop potatoes. Experimental Husbandry 24, 54–69.Google Scholar