Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T02:27:27.133Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The regrowth of swards of S24 perennial rye-grass subjected to different pretreatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Alison Davies
Alison Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In an experiment in which plots of S24 perennial rye-grass grown at a 2 in. spacing were subjected to pretreatments involving two different nitrogen levels and three different cutting frequencies it was found that subsequent regrowth was most strongly related to total stubble weight. Other significant correlations were obtained with root weight, tiller number and weight of water-soluble carbohydrates in roots and stubble.

The relationships between cultural treatments and sward condition, and between sward condition and regrowth are discussed in the light of the results from this and other experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1966 , pp. 139 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anslow, R. C. (1965). Exps Prog. Grassld Improv. Stn, 1963–1964. 17, 20.Google Scholar
Baker, H. K. (1957). J. Brit. Grassld Soc. 12, 116, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, H. K. & Garwood, E. A. (1959). J. Brit. Grassld Soc. 14, 94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brougham, R. W. (1956). Aust. J. agric. Res. 7, 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J. L. (1963). Rep. Sch. Agric. Univ. Nott. 1962, p. 65.Google Scholar
Davidson, L. J. & Milthorpe, F. L. (1965). J. Brit. Grassld Soc. 20, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, , Alison, (1965). J. Agric. Sci. 65, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. & Black, J. N. (1958). Herb. Abstr. 28, 1.Google Scholar
Jacques, W. A. (1937). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 19, 441.Google Scholar
Jones, LL. I. (1939). Bull. Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. H 15, 40.Google Scholar
Jones, LL. I. (1959). In The Measurement of Grassland Productivity, p. 35. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Lazenby, A. & Rogers, H. H. (1962). J. Agric. Sci. 59, 51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, E. & Price, R. (1942). U.S.D.A. Tech. Bull. no. 818, 51 pp.Google Scholar
McCloud, D. E. (1961). Rep. Past. Res. N East. U.S., p. 22.Google Scholar
McIlvanie, S. K. (1942). Plant Physiol. 17, 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, M. J. T. (1960). J. Brit. Grassld Soc. 15, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Davies, W. (1930). Bull. Welsh Pl. Breed. Sta. H 10, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Milton, W. E. J. (1930). Welsh J. Agric. 6, 166.Google Scholar
Troughton, A. (1963). Euphytica, 12, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, C. Y. & Blaser, R. E. (1961). Crop. Sci 1, 366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1948). J. Brit. Grassld Soc. 3, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinmann, H. (1949). Rhodesia Agric. J. 46, 175.Google Scholar