Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:46:27.698Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A radiographic study of early skeletal development in foetal sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Wenham
Affiliation:
Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen, AB2 9SB

Summary

Observations were made on high resolution radiographs of foetal sheep, from ewes slaughtered at 7-day intervals from 34 to 55 days after mating, to examine the onset of ossification of some of the major components of the axial and appendicular skeleton. There were 83 foetuses measured, retrieved from 24 Finnish Landrace × Polled Dorset Horn ewes mated to Suffolk rams. The litters comprised five sets of twins, eight of triplets, seven of quadruplets, three of quintuplets and one set of sextuplets.

Half of the ewes were subjected to a 50% reduction in food on the 28th day of gestation, but this was considered not to have affected skeletal growth and development.

There were major changes in skeletal mineralization from one slaughter date to the next, particularly between 34 days, when no skeletal elements were detectable, and 41 days, when components of the skull, thorax, fore and hindlimbs were clearly seen. There were some differences in the number of primary centres present both within and between litters of the same gestational age. The mineralized shaft of the fibula was seen in 30/35 of the foetuses at 41 days, but only in 9/25 at 55 days; other transient centres were also observed.

Changes in the linear dimensions of six limb bones were measured and the mean values are presented in tabular form.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crelin, E. S. & Koch, W. R. (1967). An autoradiographic study of chondrocyte transformation into chondroclasts and osteocytes during bone transformation in vitro. Anatomical Record 158, 473484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, H. A. (1937). The foetal growth of the sheep. Journal of Anatomy, London 71, 516527.Google ScholarPubMed
Lascelles, A. K. (1959). The time of appearance of ossification centres in the Peppin-type Merino. Australian Journal of Zoology1 7, 7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, F. E. F. (1969). Observations on the loci of ossification in the prenatal and neonatal bovine skeleton. 1. The appendicular skeleton. The British Veterinary Journal 125 (3), 101111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I., Wenham, G. & Robinson, J. J. (1977). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 3. The development in size and shape of the foetal skeleton. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 89 373391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. B. & O'Rahilly, R. (1958). Multiple techniques in the study of the onset of prenatal ossification. Anatomical Record 132, 181189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhind, S. M., Robinson, J. J., Fraser, C. & McHattie, I. (1980). Ovulation and embryo survival rates and plasma progesterone concentrations of prolific ewes treated with PMSG. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 58, 139144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, C.Hebert, C. N. & Terlecki, S. (1976). Estimation of the development age of the ovine fetus and lamb. Veterinary Record 99 (2), 2226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I., Fraser, C. & Crofts, R. M. J. (1977). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 1. Growth of the products of conception. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 539552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. N. (1955). The observations on the ossification of the appendicular skeleton of the sheep. Ph.D. thesis, Bristol University.Google Scholar
Wenham, G. (1977). Studies on reproduction in prolific ewes. 2. A radiographic study of the primary and secondary ossification centres in the foetus. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 88, 553566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar