Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T13:24:28.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prediction of the phosphorus content of herbage consumed by grazing cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. A. Little
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St Lucia, Qld, 4067, Australia
R. W. McLean
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, St Lucia, Qld, 4067, Australia
W. H. Winter
Affiliation:
C.S.I.R.O. Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures, Katherine, N.T., 5780, Australia

Summary

The determination of feed phosphorus content using oesophageally fistulated cattle is reported in this paper, from an experiment in which salivary phosphorus was labelled with 32P.

An intravenous infusion of Na232PO4 to cattle produced an immediate increase in the specific activity of salivary phosphorus, which then fell rapidly to an essentially linear asymptote by 3 h after the infusion. The phosphorus content of consumed feed was calculated from the degree of reduction in salivary specific activity by the feed phosphorus, expressed as the ratio of the specific activities of bolus and saliva phosphorus.

A dose of 100 /μCi 32P allowed the accurate prediction of phosphorus content ranging from 0·07 to 0·25% in various feeds, at intervals from 3 to 24 h after the infusion; the predicted and actual phosphorus concentrations were highly correlated (r = 0·95). Similar observations for feeds ranging from 0·14 to 0·25% phosphorus suggested that accurate prediction was also possible 144 h after infusion. Comparison of estimated feed phosphorus content of grazed material with that measured in hand-plucked herbage indicated that this approach is applicable to grazing studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, C. B. & Balch, C. C. (1961). Saliva secretion and its relation to feeding in cattle. 1. The composition and rate of secretion of parotid saliva in a small steer. British Journal of Nutrition 15, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edlefsen, J. L., Cook, C. W. & Blake, J. T. (1960). Nutrient content of the diet as determined by handplucked and esophagoal fistulae samples. Journal of Range Management 19, 560–7.Google Scholar
Goulden, C. H. (1952). Methods of Statistical Analysis London: J. Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Healy, W. B. (1973). Nutritional aspects of soil ingestion by grazing animals. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, vol. 1 (ed. Butler, G. W. and Bailey, R. W.). London and New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kiesling, H. E., Nelson, A. B. & Herbel, C. H. (1969). Chemical composition of Tobosa grass collected by hand-plucking and esophageal-fistulated steers. Journal of Range Management 22, 155–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1966). Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. 1. Differences in composition between herbage consumed and material collected from oesophageal fistulae. Animal Production 8, 253–9.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Bowles, J. E. (1973). Studies on the nutritive value of the diet selected by grazing sheep. VI. The use of tritiated water as a marker to estimate the composition of the diet from material collected by oesophageally-fistulated sheep. Animal Production 16, 5965.Google Scholar
Little, D. A. (1970). Factors of importance in the phosphorus nutrition of beef cattle in northern Australia. Australian Veterinary Journal 46, 241–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Little, D. A. (1972). Studies on cattle with oesophageal fistulae: the relation of the chemical composition of feed to that of the extruded bolus. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 12, 126–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Little, D. A. (1975). Studies on cattle with oesophageal fistulae: comparison of concentrations of mineral nutrients in feeds and associated boluses. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 15, 437–9.Google Scholar
Little, D. A. & Takken, A. (1970). Preparation of oesophageal fistulae in cattle under local anaesthesia. Australian Veterinary Journal 46, 335–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, B., Torell, D. T. & Bredon, R. M. (1967). Comparison of tropical forages of known composition with samples of these forages collected by esophageal fistulated animals. Journal of Range Management 20, 310–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcmanuts, W. B. (1961). Properties of roughage feedstuffs collected from oesophageal fistulae. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 1, 159–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Dyne, G. M. & Torell, D. T. (1964). Development and use of the oesophageal fistula: a review. Journal of Range Management 17, 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar