Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T04:34:18.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Planting pattern of two pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) cultivars when intercropped with groundnut (Arachis hypogaea)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. J. Rao
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
B. N. Mittra
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India

Summary

Field experiments were conducted during the two monsoon seasons of 1985 and 1986 at Kharagpur, West Bengal, to investigate the effect of pigeonpea cultivars and their planting pattern on the performance of a groundnut–pigeonpea intercrop. In intercropping the crops were also sown at 100% population of their sole crops. Groundnut plant growth and development was affected by intercropping with pigeonpea and the decline in pod yield ranged from 7 to 50% of the sole crop yield. The compact, short-statured and short duration pigeonpea cultivar, ICPL87, intercepted only 50% of the incoming solar radiation as against the 70% intercepted by LRG30 at the peak vegetative stage. The significantly higher groundnut yield (48%) obtained from the intercrop with the former pigeonpea cultivar as compared to the latter justifies the belief that the performance of the groundnut was light-related. This was further confirmed when the light interception by pigeonpea was reduced by increasing the row spacing from 90 to 150 cm and there was a consequent increase in groundnut yield. The cultivar and row arrangement of pigeonpea that allowed equal utilization of light by both crops gave increased productivity.

Type
Crops and Soils
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chauhan, Y. S., Venkataratnam, N. & Sheldrake, A. (1984). The high yield potential of extra early pigeonpeas in peninsular India. International Pigeonpea Newsletter 3, 2831.Google Scholar
De, R. & Singh, S. P. (1979). Management practices for intercropping system. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intercropping, pp. 1724. Hyderabad, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar
Dhaliwal, J. S., Kler, D. S. & Atwal, A. S. (1984). Biomass production of groundnut in relation to light penetration through monoculture and mixed culture. Indian Journal of Ecology 11, 99104.Google Scholar
Fawusi, M. O. A. (1985). Influence of spatial arrangements on the growth, fruit and grain yields and yield components of intercropped maize and okra (Abelmoschus esculentus). Field Crops Research 11, 345352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegde, B. R., Vishwanath, A. P. & Havanagi, G. V. (1980). Annual Progress Report, All India Co-ordinated Research Project on Dry Land Agriculture, Bangalore, India, pp. 4244.Google Scholar
Lim, E. S. & Hamdan, O. (1984). The reproductive characters of four varieties of groundnut. Pertanika 7, 2531.Google Scholar
Rao, L. J. & Mittra, B. N. (1988). Growth and yield of groundnut as influenced by degree and duration of shading. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 160, 260265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchijima, Z. (1976). Maize and rice. In Vegetation and the Atmosphere (Ed. Monteith, J. L.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Veeraswamy, R., Ratnaswamy, R. & Palaniswamy, G. A. (1974). Studies on the mixed cropping of redgram and groundnut under irrigation. Madras Agricultural Journal 61, 801802.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W., Rao, M. R. & Natarajan, M. (1981). Traditional cropping systems with pigeonpea and their improvement. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Pigeonpea, pp. 1125. Hyderabad, India: ICRISAT.Google Scholar