Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T18:32:23.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant density effects on growth, yield, leaf area index and light transmission on intercropped maize and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in Nigeria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. O. A. Fawusi
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
S. B. C. Wanki
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
D. Nangju
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria

Summary

In field experiments at the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture in Nigeria, two cow-pea cultivars, TVU-1209 and FARV-13 and a composite maize cultivar were intercropped at plant densities of 10000, 20000, 30000 and 40000 plants/ha in a split-plot design. There were four replications of each density. Results showed that increasing cow-pea plant density increased the number of days to flowering but decreased the numbers of branches and of leaves per plant in both monoculture and mixture. Different varietal responses to plant density were observed for other growth measurements. While TVU-1209 yielded the highest dry matter at 20000 plants/ha in monoculture and mixture, FARV-13 did so at 40000 plants/ha in monoculture and at 20000 in mixture. Some yield components decreased while others were unaffected by increasing plant density. Similar response pattern was observed for maize. Both leaf area index and light interception were greater in FARV-13 than in TVU-1209.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Enyi, B. A. C. (1973). Effects of intercropping maize or sorghum with cow-pea, pigeon pea and beans. Experimental Agriculture 9, 8390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, N. M. (1977). Studies in mixed cropping. II. Population pressures in maize-bean mixtures. Experimental Agriculture 13, 185191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (1974). Annual Report, pp. 4458. Cali, Columbia.Google Scholar
Moormann, F. R., Lal, R. & Juo, A. S. B. (1975). The soils of IITA. Technical Bulletin no. 3. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Vanichyangkool, S. (1972). A comparison of corn yield at different rates of planting interplanted with soybean in the dry season. Field Crop Abstracts 24, 1611.Google Scholar
Wahua, T. A. T. & Miller, D. A. (1978). Relative yield totals and yield components of intercropped sorghum and soybean. Agronomy Journal 70 (2), 287291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanki, S. B. C., Fawtjsi, M. O. A. & Nangju, D. (1982). Pod and grain yields from intercropping maize and Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. K. & Osirtj, D. S. (1972). Studies in mixtures of dwarf sorghum and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 531540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar