Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T14:20:49.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phosphate response, base saturation and silica relationships in acid soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. F. Birch
Affiliation:
East African Agriculture and Forestry Research Organization, Kikuyu, Kenya

Extract

The inverse relationship described in an earlier publication between phosphate response and the degree of base saturation has been confirmed with three further groups of field experiments. As an alternative to the degree of base saturation soil pH may be employed.

The discrepancies sometimes found with the more acid base-unsaturated soils, between actual phosphate responses and those expected from the degree of base saturation were found to be related to the control yields. In general, the higher the control yield on a distinctly acid soil the more the percentage response to phosphate fell short of that expected, and vice versa. By forming multiple regressions of percentage phosphate response on both control yield and the percentage saturation of the B.E.C. a more accurate assessment of phosphate response is possible than by using the simple regression of response on the percentage saturation of the B.E.C. A measurable soil characteristic that could be used in the multiple regressions instead of the control yield was not found.

Very significant and inverse relationships were established between percentage phosphate response and the amount of water-soluble or citric acidsoluble silica. These silica contents were also found to be significantly and directly related to the percentage saturation of the B.E.C. It appears that measurements of pH, silica and base saturation function similarly in classifying the soils, distinguishing between the almost neutral soils retaining phosphate in an available form associated with exchangeable bases, acid soils with relatively unavailable phosphate associated with iron and aluminium compounds, and soils intermediate between these.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

The B.D.H. Book of Organic Reagents (1946), 9th ed. p. 158.Google Scholar
Birch, H. F. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, J. B. (1933). Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 30, 460.Google Scholar
McGeorge, W. T. (1924). Soil Sci. 17, 463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemec, A. (1930). Wiss. Arch. Landw., Abt. A, Pflanze, 4, 228 (Chem. Abstr. 25, 1935).Google Scholar
Nemec, A. (1932). Proc. 2nd Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Leningrad, 1930, IV, 215.Google Scholar
Nye, P. H. (1952). Emp. J. Exp. Agric. 77, 47.Google Scholar
Teichert, W. (1946). I.V.A. 17, 135 (Chem. Abstr. 41, 1781).Google Scholar