Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:56:59.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutritional studies with sheep fed conserved ryegrass. 2. Silage supplemented with dried grass or barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. G. Wernli  and
R. J. Wilkins
C. G. Wernli
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research InstituteHurleyMaidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
R. J. Wilkins
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research InstituteHurleyMaidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Grass silage (21.0 % D.M.) was given ad libitum to sheep together with supplements of rolled barley, dried-grass pellets or dried-grass wafers at 12 and 25 g organic matter (OM)/kg0·75.

Intake of silage was greater with supplement at 12 g/kg0·75 but total intake of OM and digestible organic matter (DOM) increased with increasing supplement. Intake of OM was higher with the pellet supplement than with other supplements. Intake of DOM, however, did not differ between the pellet and barley treatments, but was lower with wafers.

Concentrations of ammonia and total volatile fatty acids and the molar proportions of butyric and higher volatile fatty acids were higher when silage was supplemented with barley than with dried grass. Mean rumen retention times of silage and of supplement were highest in the barley-supplemented treatments. Dried-grass wafers were retained longer than dried-grass pellets. Supplement treatments did not differ significantly for eating and ruminating times, rumen fluid volume and pH, digestion rate in the rumen and nitrogen retention.

At the low supplement rate silage consumption may have been controlled by factors associated directly with the silage, whereas at the high rate intake was limited either by physical factors or by the potential energy demand of the animals.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , February 1980 , pp. 219 - 227
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J. & Cammell, S. B. (1976). The digestion of fresh and dried grass by sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 443–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. British Journal of Nutrition 19, 511–522.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canaway, R. J., Terry, R. A. & Tilley, J. M. A. (1965). An automatic sampler of fluids from the rumen of fistulated sheep. Research in Veterinary Science 6, 416–422.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1968). The use of barn-dried hay and silage in fattening young beef cattle. Journal of the British Grassland Society 23, 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. H. D. (1970). Silage for winter fattening. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, F. F. & McIlmoyle, W. A. (1973). The use of dried grass in dairy cow rations. Proceedings of the First International Green Crop Drying Congress, Oxford, pp. 176–181.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. & Bath, I. H. (1973). Effects of energy and nitrogen supplementation of silage diets on rumen fermentation in fistulated heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W., Spillane, T. A. & Bath, I. H. (1973). Studies on the nutritive value of silage with particular reference to the effects of energy and nitrogen supplementation in growing heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. & Murdoch, J. C. (1965). The influence of supplements of flaked maize on the digestibility by steers of silage, fresh lucerne and lucerne hay. Journal of the British Grassland Society 20, 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, J. C. (1964). Some factors affecting the intake of roughage by sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polan, C. E., Chandler, P. T. & Sandy, R. A. (1970). Effects of concentrate on barley silage and nitrogen utilization by lactating cows fed large amounts of urea. Journal of Dairy Science 53, 1584–1586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayler, J. C. (1970). Dried forages and beef production. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 180–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tayler, J. C. & Aston, K. (1976). Milk production from diets of silage and dried forage. 1. Effects of methods of processing dried grass and of including barley in the supplementation of grass silage given ad libitum. Animal Production 23, 197–209.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (1968). The digestibility and utilization of fresh grass, hay and silage by sheep. Animal Production 10, 240.Google Scholar
Troelsen, J. E. & Campbell, J. B. (1968). Voluntary consumption of forage by sheep and its relation to the size and shape of particles in the digestive tract. Animal Production 10, 289–296.Google Scholar
Wernli, C. G. (1971). Nutritional studies on feed supplements for grass silage. Ph.D. thesis, Reading University.Google Scholar
Wernli, C. G. & Wilkins, R. J. (1980). Nutritional studies with sheep fed conserved ryegrass. 1. Silage and dried grass offered ad libitum without supplement. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 93, 209–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1970). The ad libitum intake and digestibility of dried grass pellets and silage by sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar