Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T22:17:39.596Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrition of the bacon pig XVI. The relative supplemental value of the proteins in extracted soya-bean meal and in white-fish meal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. E. Evans
R. E. Evans
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In continuation of our work on the relative supplemental value of animal and vegetable protein concentrates (Woodman & Evans, 1951), a study has been made of the proteins in extracted soya-bean meal. It is probable that vegetable protein concentrates may vary among themselves in nutritive value and that the proteins of ground-nut meal, which were the subject of investigation in our previous experiments, could not for this reason be regarded as representative of vegetable proteins in general. The same basal diet, composed of roughly 2 parts of barley meal and 1 part of fine bran, together with a little lucerne meal and minerals, was again used in the present investigation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 1952 , pp. 438 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1952

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Almquist, H. J., Mecchi, E., Kratzer, F. H. & Gratt, C. R. (1942). J. Nutrit. 21, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, H. R. & Mattingley, J. P. (1945). Poult. Sci. 24, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, R. E. (1929). J. Agric. Sci. 19, 752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, W. E., Sandstedt, R. M. & Mussehl, F. E. (1945). J. Biol. Cham. 161, 635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, J. W. (1937). Oil and Soap, 14, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, J. W. & Hafner, F. H. (1941). Poult. Sci. 20, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, J. W., Steenbock, H. & Bohstedt, G. (1936). J. Nutrit. 11, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. L., Parsons, H. T. & Steenbock, H. (1939). J. Nutrit. 18, 423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klose, A. A., Hill, B. & Fevold, H. L. (1950). Arch. Biochem. 27, 364.Google Scholar
Kunitz, M. (1945). Science, 101, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunitz, M. (1947). J. Gen. Physiol. 30, 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lelner, I. E., Spector, H., Fevold, H. L. & Berryman, G. H. (1949). Arch. Biochem. 24, 299.Google Scholar
Osborne, T. B. & Mendel, L. B. (1917). J. Biol. Chem. 32, 369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, H. T. (1943). J. Home Econ. 35, 211.Google Scholar
Westfall, R. J. & Hauge, S. M. (1948). J. Nutrit. 35, 388.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1948 a). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1948 b). J. Agric. Sci. 38, 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodman, H. E. & Evans, R. E. (1951). J. Agric. Sci. 41, 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar