Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T04:45:53.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on the analysis of covariance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. S. Bartlett
M. S. Bartlett
Affiliation:
(Statistician, Imperial Chemical Industries, Limited, Jealott's Hill Research Station, Bracknell, Berks)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. In recent papers which refer to the use of covariance there has still appeared an occasional lack of understanding of this method of statistical analysis. There have, for example, been references in the literature to methods of analysis which the writer has used in certain problems as if they were in competition with the use of covariance as described by Fisher (1, 2). It would therefore seem to be of value to indicate briefly the different situations in which covariance may prove of use, in order that the distinction between some of these situations may be clearly realised.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 26 , Issue 3 , July 1936 , pp. 488 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1936

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods far Research Workers (1934), 5th ed.Google Scholar
(2)Fisher, R. A.The Design of Experiments (1935).Google Scholar
(3)Bartlett, M. S.Proc. Camb. phil. Soc. (1934), 30, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Bartlett, M. S.Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. (1934), 30, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Bartlett, M. S.J. agric. Sci. (1935), 25, 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Watson, S. J. and Ferguson, W. S.J. agric. Sci. (1936), 26, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Wishart, J. and Sanders, H. G.Principles and Practice of Field Experimentation (1935).Google Scholar
(8)GarnẸr, F. H., Grantham, J. and Sanders, H. G.J. agric. Sci. (1934), 24, 250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar