Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wp2c8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:39:01.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The mechanism of cellulose digestion in the ruminant organism: II. The transformation of cellulose into glucose by the agency of cellulose-splitting bacteria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. E. Woodman
Affiliation:
(The Institutes of Animal Nutrition and Animal Pathology, Cambridge University.)
J. Stewart
Affiliation:
(The Institutes of Animal Nutrition and Animal Pathology, Cambridge University.)

Extract

An attempt was made in a recent communication (1) to propound a theory in connection with the digestion of cellulose in the ruminant organism which should be compatible with Kellner's findings as to the value of digestible fibre in the fattening of ruminants. It was shown that the generally accepted theory, that cellulose is digested by bacterial agency in the rumen with the production of organic acids and gaseous products, such as methane, hydrogen and carbon dioxide, failed entirely to account for the equal values of digestible fibre and starch for fat production in the ruminant animal. This could only be explained by assuming that glucose (or some other sugar capable of hydrolysis to glucose) was formed as a primary product of the action of bacteria on cellulose, and that, as with digestible carbohydrates originally present in the food, only about 8 per cent, of the sugar so formed underwent further bacterial breakdown into organic acids and gases, the remainder being available for absorption into the organism in the form of glucose. On this assumption, it would follow that every gram of fibre so digested would yield to the organism as much glucose as would a gram of starch, and in this way Kellner's practical finding would be capable of explanation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Woodman, (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Pringsheim, (1912). Zeit. f. physiol. Chem. 78, 266.Google Scholar
(3)Viljoen, Fred and Peterson, (1926). J. Agric. Sci. 16, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar