Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T00:21:47.798Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Longevity of ram sperm in various diluents and at different dilution rates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

H. Schindler  and
D. Amir
H. Schindler
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Station, Rehovot, Israel
D. Amir
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Station, Rehovot, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effect of various diluents and different dilution rates on the maintenance of motility of ram sperm during storage at 4° C. was tested. Their efficiency was determined by half-life periods and total survival times of the sperm.

A yolk-glycine-citrate diluent maintained sperm motility for a longer period than did yolk—fructose—phosphate, yolk-citrate, cow's milk and ewe's milk, with or without yolk. This diluent has the advantage that the sperm is clearly visible under the microscope, and no sedimentation of any component occurs.

A modified IVT diluent prolonged the total life span of the sperm, but caused a faster motility decline in the first part of the storage period.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 56 , Issue 2 , April 1961 , pp. 183 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1961

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, S. I. (1955). J. Agric. Sci. 46, 164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, D. C. (1955). Rev. Patronato Biol. Anim. 1, 199.Google Scholar
Dadzier, L. (1956). Proc. 3rd Int. Congr. Anim. Reproduction, Sect. III, p. 12.Google Scholar
Dauzier, L., Thibault, C. & Wintenberger, S. (1954). Ann. Endocr. 15, 341.Google Scholar
Emmens, C. W. (1959). Progress in the Physiology of Farm Animals, ed. by Hammond, J., Chapter 22: Fertility in the male. London: Butterworths Sci, Publ.Google Scholar
Flipse, R. J. & Almquist, J. O. (1956). J. Dairy Sci. 39, 1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoop, C. E. & Krause, W. E. (1944). J. Dairy Sci. 27, 657.Google Scholar
Kvasnitsky, A. (1956). 3rd Int. Congr. Anim. Reproduction, Plenary Papers, p. 68.Google Scholar
Laing, J. A. (1955). Fertility and Infertility in the domestic Animal. London: Ballière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Mies Filho, A. & de Almeida Ramos, A. (1954). Bol. Insem. artif. (Rio de J.), 6, 28; Anim. Breed. Abstr. 24, 270.Google Scholar
Milovanov, V. & Khabibulin, Kh. (1933). Probl. Zhivotn. 5, 83; Anim. Breed, Abstr. 1, 225.Google Scholar
Moore, B. H., Mayer, D. T. & McKenzie, F. F. (1940). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33, 210; Chem. Abstr. 35, 7014.Google Scholar
Phillips, P. H. & Lardy, H. A. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, Lord (1949). Nature, Lond., 163, 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. & Bishop, M. W. H. (1954). Nature, Lond., 174, 746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A., Gupta, H. C., Srivastava, R. K. & Pandey, M. D. (1956). Indian Vet. J. 33, 18.Google Scholar
Saha, S. K. & Singh, R. B. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 1633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakala, J. (1957). Pol'nohospodarstvo, 4, 508; Anim. Breed. Abstr. 26, 179.Google Scholar
Salisbury, G. W., Fuller, H. K. & Willett, E. L. (1941). J. Dairy Sci. 24, 905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schindler, H., Volcani, R. & Eyal, E. (1957). J. Agr. Res. Sta., Rehovot, Kravim. 5 (3), 45.Google Scholar
Stower, J. & Husaim, Bud (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 49, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. & Rothschild, Lord (1951). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N. Y., 76, 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, A. & Takabe, T. Y. (1952). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 81, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Demark, N. L. & Sharma, U. D. (1957). J. Dairy Sci. 40, 438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, I. G. (1954). Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 7 (3), 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willett, E. L. & Ohms, J. I. (1958). J. Dairy Sci. 41, 275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar