Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:52:59.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpopulational and intervarietal hybridization in Lolium perenne breeding: heterosis under non-competitive conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. A. Foster
C. A. Foster
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Loughgall, Co. Armagh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The current status of herbage grass breeding is considered in relation to the utilization of first-generation hybrid vigour. A breeding scheme is outlined by which it is suggested that interpopulational F1 hybrid varieties could be developed to provide a simple and effective means of exploiting heterotic potential in herbage grass species. A survey of interpopulational F1 heterosis expressed, under two levels of fertility in non-competitive spaced-plants conditions, by the hybrids of a group of six adapted perennial ryegrass varieties, is reported here.

Although the F1 hybrid populations studied were not on average superior to the parental varieties there were large variations between specific hybrids. Two hybrids were particularly promising, exhibiting 25% and 31% heterosis over the higheryielding of their parents for total green-matter yield over two harvest years and two fertility levels. The bulk of this heterosis arose under high-fertility conditions, when the mean yield response of the interpopulational F1 hybrid was twice that of the parental varieties.

The effects of inherent relationships between the parental varieties on the observed levels of heterosis are considered, as are the possibilities for the practice of recurrent selection procedures for the enhancement of heterotic expression in some of these hybrids. It is concluded that there is sufficient evidence for the existence of interpopulational heterosis in this species to merit an extension and application of this approach to include a wider range of varieties and. populations, both adapted and introduced.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 76 , Issue 1 , February 1971 , pp. 107 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beddows, A. R. (1953). The ryegrasses in British Agriculture: a survey. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stn Bull., Ser. H, no. 17.Google Scholar
Breese, E. L. & Lewis, E. J. (1960).The effect of varying numbers of parent plants on the behaviour of synthetic varieties. Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stn for 1959, p. 21.Google Scholar
Burton, G. W. (1956). Utilization of heterosis in pasture plant breeding. Proc. 7th int. Grassld Congr. p. 439.Google Scholar
Burton, G. W. & Sprague, G. F. (1961). Use of hybrid vigour in plant improvement. In Germ Plasm Resources (ed. Hodgeson, R. E.), p. 191. Washington: Am. Ass. Adv. Sci., publ. no. 66.Google Scholar
Corkill, L. (1956). The basis of synthetic strains of cross-pollinated grasses. Proc. 7th int. Grassld Congr. p. 427.Google Scholar
Craiomtles, J. P. (1966). Utilization of heterosis in Sudan-grass breeding. Proc. 10th int. Grassld Congr. p. 801.Google Scholar
Craigmiles, J. P., Crowder, L. V. & Newton, J. P. (1965). Methods of breeding smooth bromegrass. Crop Sci. 5, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, S. A., Harrison, M. N. & Ogada, F. (1967). A comprehensive breeding system. Züchter. 37, 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1965). Polythene-terylene tents for large-scale artificial isolation in ryegrass breeding. Rec. agric. Res. Minist. Agric. Nth. Ire. 13, 137.Google Scholar
Foster, C. A. (1968). A study of intervarietal heterosis in Lolium perenne L. Ph.D. thesis, Queen's University, Belfast.Google Scholar
Gardner, C. O. (1963). Estimates of genetic parameters in cross-fertilizing plants and their implications in plant breeding. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Publ. no. 982, p. 225, N.A.S., N.R.C.Google Scholar
Hanson, C. H., Gratjmann, H. O.Kehr, W. R., Caenahan, H. L., Davies, R. L., Dudley, J. W., Elling, L. J., Lowe, C. C., Smith, D., Sobenson, E. L. & Wilsie, C. P. (1964). Relative performance of alfalfa varieties, variety crosses and variety mixtures. A.R.S., U.S. Hep. Agric. Prod. Res. Rep. no. 83.Google Scholar
Lonnquist, J. H. & Gardner, C. O. (1961). Heterosis in intervarietal crosses in maize and its implications in breeding procedures. Crop Sci. 1, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moll, R. H., Lonnquist, J. H., Fortuno, J. V. & Johnson, E. C. (1965). The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics 52, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterniani, E. & Lonnquist, J. H. (1963). Heterosis in interracial crosses of corn. Crop Sci. 3, 504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penny, L. H., Russell, W. A., Sprague, G. F. & Hallauer, A. R. (1963). Recurrent selection. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Publ. no. 982, p. 352, N.A.S., N.R.C.Google Scholar
Pfahler, P. L. (1966a). Heterosis and homeostasis in rye (Secale cereale). I. Individual plant production of varieties and intervarietal crosses. Crop Sci. 6, 397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfahler, P. L. (1966b). Heterosis and homeostasis in rye (Secale cereale). II. Production of varieties, intervarietal crosses and composite populations under various population densities. Crop Sci. 6, 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, E., Robinson, H. F. & Comstock, R. E. (1957). Interpopulation hybrids in open-pollinated varieties of maize. Am. Nat. 91, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protofoot, K. G. & Wright, C. E. (1958). An assessment of the relative value of three methods of determining leanness of perennial ryegrass. Res. exp. Rec. Minist. Agric. Nth. Ire. 7, 27.Google Scholar
Richey, F. D. (1922). The experimental basis for the present status of corn breeding. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 14, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. F., Comstock, R. E., Khalll, A. & Harvey, P. H. (1956). Dominance versus overdominance in heterosis: evidence from crosses between open-pollinated varieties of maize. Am. Nat. 90, 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sriwatanapongse, S. & Wilsie, C. P. (1968). Intraand intervariety crosses of Medicago saliva L. and Medicago falcata L. Crop Sci. 8, 465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timothy, D. H. (1963). Genetic diversity, heterosis and the use of exotic stocks of maize in Columbia. In Statistical Genetics and Plant Breeding. Publ. no. 982, p. 581, N.A.S., N.R.C.Google Scholar
Wright, C. E. & Robinson, A. H. L. (1962). Spacedplant data collected (1957—1960) during a preliminary examination of 100 cultivars and ecotypes of Lolium perenne. Res. exp. Rec. Minist. Agric. Nth, Ire. 11, 9.Google Scholar