Skip to main content Accessibility help

Interaction between plant density and nitrogen management strategy in improving maize grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency on the North China Plain

  • P. YAN (a1), Q. ZHANG (a2) (a3), X. F. SHUAI (a3) (a4), J. X. PAN (a1), W. J. ZHANG (a1), J. F. SHI (a1), M. WANG (a1), X. P. CHEN (a1) and Z. L. CUI (a1)...


Understanding the physiological mechanisms of biomass accumulation and partitioning in the grain, and the nitrogen (N) uptake associated with different plant densities and N management strategies, is essential for achieving both high yield and N use efficiency (NUE) in maize plants. A field experiment was conducted in 2013 and 2014, using five rates of N application and three plant densities (6·0, 7·5 and 9·0 plants/m2) in Quzhou County on the North China Plain (NCP). The objective was to evaluate whether higher plant density can produce more biomass allocated to the grain to achieve higher grain yield and to determine the optimal N management strategies for different plant densities. The highest grain yield and NUE were achieved in the 7·5 plants/m2 treatment; both the sub-optimal (6·0 plants/m2) and supra-optimal (9·0 plants/m2) plant densities resulted in diminished yield and NUE. Compared to 6·0 plants/m2, the 7·5 plants/m2 treatment displayed higher biomass accumulation during the grain-filling period and also exhibited more biomass allocated to kernels with similar total biomass accumulation compared with the 9·0 plants/m2 treatment, which contributed to its higher grain yield. The N uptake in the 7·5 plants/m2 treatment was similar to that in the 9·0 plants/m2 treatment up to pre-silking. However, the post-silking N uptake of the 7·5 plants/m2 treatment was 66·4 kg/ha, which was 29·1% higher than that of the 9·0 plants/m2 treatment. Furthermore, the highest maize grain yield was achieved in the 0·7 × optimal N rate (ONR × 0·7), ONR and ONR × 1·3 treatments for 6·0, 7·5 and 9·0 plants/m2, respectively, which suggests that different N management strategies are needed for different plant densities. In conclusion, selecting a planting density of 7·5 plants/m2 with an in-season root zone N management is a potentially effective strategy for achieving high grain yield and high NUE for maize production on the NCP.


Corresponding author

* To whom all correspondence should be addressed. Email:


Hide All
Andrade, F. H., Uhart, S. A. & Frugone, M. I. (1993). Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize: shade versus plant density effects. Crop Science 33, 482485.
Andrade, F. H., Vega, C., Uhart, S., Cirilo, A., Cantarero, M. & Valentinuz, O. (1999). Kernel number determination in maize. Crop Science 39, 453459.
Andrade, F. H., Calvino, P., Cirilo, A. & Barbieri, P. (2002). Yield responses to narrow rows depend on increased radiation interception. Agronomy Journal 94, 975980.
Antonietta, M., Fanello, D. D., Acciaresi, H. A. & Guiamet, J. J. (2014). Senescence and yield responses to plant density in stay green and earlier-senescing maize hybrids from Argentina. Field Crops Research 155, 111119.
Bertin, P. & Gallais, A. (2000). Genetic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in a set of recombinant maize inbred lines. I. Agrophysiological results. Maydica 45, 5366.
Boomsma, C. R., Santini, J. B., Tollenaar, M. & Vyn, T. J. (2009). Maize morphophysiological responses to intense crowding and low nitrogen availability: an analysis and review. Agronomy Journal 101, 14261452.
Borrás, L., Maddonni, G. A. & Otegui, M. E. (2003). Leaf senescence in maize hybrids: plant population, row spacing, and kernel set effects. Field Crops Research 82, 1326.
Cardwell, V. B. (1982). Fifty years of Minnesota corn production: sources of yield increase. Agronomy Journal 74, 984990.
Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A. R. & Walters, D. T. (2002). Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio 31, 132140.
Chen, G. P. (1995). Study on cultivation technology with the highest record of maize production in China. Maize Science 3, 2630. (in Chinese with English abstract).
Chen, G. P., Yang, G. H., Zhao, M. & Zhao, J. R. (2008). Studies on maize small area super- high yield trails and cultivation technique. Journal of Maize Sciences 16, 14. (in Chinese, with English abstract).
Chen, X., Zhang, F., Römheld, V., Horlacher, D., Schulz, R., Böning-Zilkens, M., Wang, P. & Claupein, W. (2006). Synchronizing N supply from soil and fertilizer and N demand of winter wheat by an improved Nmin method. Nutrition Cycling in Agroecosystems 74, 9198.
Chen, X. P., Cui, Z. L., Vitousek, P. M., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Bai, J. S., Meng, Q. F., Hou, P., Yue, S. C., Römheld, V. & Zhang, F. S. (2011). Integrated soil–crop system management for food security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 63996404.
Ciampitti, I. A. & Vyn, T. J. (2011). A comprehensive study of plant density consequences on nitrogen uptake dynamics of maize plants from vegetative to reproductive stage. Field Crops Research 121, 218.
Cui, Z. (2005). Optimization of the nitrogen fertilizer management for a winter wheat–summer maize rotation system in the North China Plain—from field to regional scale. Ph.D. dissertation. China Agricultural University, Beijing, (in Chinese with English abstract).
Cui, Z., Zhang, F., Chen, X., Miao, Y., Li, J., Shi, L., Xu, J., Ye, Y., Liu, C., Yang, Z., Zhang, Q., Huang, S. & Bao, D. (2008). On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil N min test. Field Crops Research 105, 4855.
Cui, Z., Zhang, F., Mi, G., Chen, F., Li, F., Chen, X., Li, J. & Shi, L. (2009). Interaction between genotypic difference and nitrogen management strategy in determining nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize. Plant and Soil 317, 267276.
D'Andrea, K. E., Otegui, M. E. & Cirilo, A. G. (2008). Kernel number determination differs among maize hybrids in response to nitrogen. Field Crops Research 105, 228239.
Ding, L., Wang, K. J., Jiang, G. M., Liu, M. Z., Niu, S. L. & Gao, L. M. (2005). Post-anthesis changes in photosynthetic traits of maize hybrids released in different years. Field Crops Research 93, 108115.
Duvick, D. N. (2005). The contribution of breeding to yield advances in maize. Advances in Agronomy 86, 83145.
Dwyer, L. M., Tollenaar, M. & Houwing, L. (1991). A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 505509.
Echarte, L., Rothstein, S. & Tollenaar, M. (2008). The response of leaf photosynthesis and dry matter accumulation to nitrogen supply in an older and a newer maize hybrid. Crop Science 48, 656665.
FAO (2012). FAOSTAT-Agriculture Database. Rome: FAO. Available at
Finger, R. (2010). Evidence of slowing yield growth – the example of Swiss cereal yields. Food Policy 35, 175182.
Horowitz, W. (1970). Official Methods of Analysis, 11th edn, Washington, DC: AOAC.
Lee, E. A. & Tollenaar, M. (2007). Physiological basis of successful breeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Science 47 (Suppl. 3), S202S215.
Li, S. K. & Wang, C. T. (2009). Evolution and development of maize production techniques in China. Scientia Agricola 42, 19411951.
Ma, B. L. & Dwyer, L. M. (1998). Nitrogen uptake and use of two contrasting maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. Plant and Soil 199, 283291.
Maddonni, G. A. & Otegui, M. E. (1996). Leaf area, light interception, and crop development in maize. Field Crops Research 48, 8187.
Meng, Q., Hou, P., Wu, L., Chen, X., Cui, Z. & Zhang, F. (2013). Understanding production potentials and yields gaps in intensive maize production in China. Field Crops Research 143, 9197.
Montgomery, E. G. (1911). Correlation Studies in Corn. Nebraska. Agricul. Exp. Stn. Annual. Report 24. Lincoln, NE: Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station.
Paponov, I. A. & Engels, C. (2003). Effect of nitrogen supply on leaf traits related to photosynthesis during grain filling in two maize genotypes with different N efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 166, 756763.
Peltonen-Sainio, P., Jauhiainen, L. & Laurila, I. P. (2009). Cereal yield trends in northern European conditions: changes in yield potential and its realisation. Field Crops Research 110, 8590.
Pommel, B., Gallais, A., Coque, M., Quillere, I., Hirel, B., Prioul, J., Andrieu, B. & Floriot, M. (2006). Carbon and nitrogen allocation and grain filling in three maize hybrids differing in leaf senescence. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 203211.
Rajcan, I. & Tollenaar, M. (1999). Source: sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize:: I. Dry matter accumulation and partitioning during grain filling. Field Crops Research 60, 245253.
Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. (2012). Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nature Communications 3, 1293. doi:10.1038/ncomms2296
Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. (2013). Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE 8, e66428. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066428
Ritchie, S. W., Hanway, J. J., Benson, G. O. & Herman, J. C. (1993). How a Corn Plant Develops. Special Report No. 48. Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Rosegrant, M. R., Ringler, C., Sulser, T. B., Ewing, M., Palazzo, A., Zhu, T., Nelson, G. C., Koo, J., Robertson, R., Msangi, S. & Batka, M. (2009). Agriculture and Food Security under Global Change: Prospects for 2025/2050. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
Sangoi, L., Gracietti, M. A., Rampazzo, C. & Bianchetti, P. (2002). Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant population. Field Crops Research 79, 3951.
Shiferaw, B., Prasanna, B. M., Hellin, J. & Bänziger, M. (2011). Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security 3, 307327.
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108, 2026020264.
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R. & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418, 671677.
Tollenaar, M. (1991). Physiological basis of genetic improvement of maize hybrids in Ontario from 1959 to 1988. Crop Science 31, 119124.
Tollenaar, M. & Aguilera, A. (1992). Radiation use efficiency of an old and a new maize hybrid. Agronomy Journal 84, 536541.
Tollenaar, M. & Lee, E. A. (2002). Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Research 75, 161169.
Tollenaar, M. & Wu, J. (1999). Yield improvement in temperate maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Science 39, 15971604.
Tollenaar, M., Aguilera, A. & Nissanka, S. P. (1997). Grain yield is reduced more by weed interference in an old than in a new maize hybrid. Agronomy Journal 89, 239246.
Tokatlidis, I. S. & Koutroubas, S. D. (2004). A review of maize hybrids’ dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Research 88, 103114.
Vos, J., van der Putten, P. E. L. & Birch, C. J. (2005). Effect of nitrogen supply on leaf appearance, leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity in maize. Field Crops Research 93, 6473.
Yan, P., Yue, S. C., Qiu, M. L., Chen, X. P., Cui, Z. L. & Chen, F. J. (2014). Using maize hybrids and in-season nitrogen management to improve grain yield and grain nitrogen concentrations. Field Crops Research 166, 3845.
Zhao, R. F., Chen, X., Zhang, F., Zhang, H., Schroder, J. & Römheld, V. (2006). Fertilization and nitrogen balance in a wheat–maize rotation system in north China. Agronomy Journal 98, 938945.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Interaction between plant density and nitrogen management strategy in improving maize grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency on the North China Plain

  • P. YAN (a1), Q. ZHANG (a2) (a3), X. F. SHUAI (a3) (a4), J. X. PAN (a1), W. J. ZHANG (a1), J. F. SHI (a1), M. WANG (a1), X. P. CHEN (a1) and Z. L. CUI (a1)...


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.