Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T17:38:04.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of sowing rate on dry matter yield, plant density and survival of lucerne (Medicago sativa) under dryland and irrigated conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. J. Thompson  and
D. G. Stout
D. J. Thompson
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 3015 Ord Road, Kamloops, BC, Canada, V2B 8A9
D. G. Stout
Affiliation:
Research Station, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 3015 Ord Road, Kamloops, BC, Canada, V2B 8A9
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) sowing rates were evaluated to determine how environmental conditions affect seedling establishment and plant survival. Lucerne (cv. Peace) was sown during 1988 at rates ranging from 2·8 to 11·2 kg ha-1 at one irrigated and two dryland sites (a forest and a mid-elevation grassland site) near Kamloops, British Columbia, Canada. Dry matter (DM) yield was measured for 3 years, and plants were counted to estimate seedling establishment and plant survival. Sowing year DM yield increased linearly with sowing rate at the irrigated and forest sites, but at the mid-elevation grassland site it decreased at sowing rates > 5·6 kg ha-1. In the first full-production year, DM yield levelled off at sowing rates > 8·4 kg ha-1 at the irrigated site and was not affected by sowing rate at the forest site. At the grassland site, first full-production year DM yield decreased at sowing rates > 2·8 kg ha-1. In the second full-production year, there was a linear effect of sowing rate on DM yield at the irrigated site, but it did not affect DM yield at the two dryland sites. At all sites, the percentage of seedlings that survived to the end of the second growing season decreased curvilinearly as seedling density increased. Survival was less at the irrigated site than at the dryland sites. Higher sowing rates are required at irrigated sites than at dryland sites to obtain maximum yield or a required plant population density.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 126 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 301 - 306
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alberta Forage Crops Advisory Committee (1989). Varieties of perennial hay and pasture crops for Alberta. Agdex 120/32 Alberta Agriculture.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. S., Ditterline, R. L. & Welty, L. E. (1979). Seed size and seeding rate effects upon stand density and yield of alfalfa. Agronomy Journal 71, 83–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gom, F. B. (1964). A comparison of two sweetclover strains and Ladak alfalfa alone and in mixture with crested wheatgrass for range and dryland seeding. Journal of Range Management 17, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, L. H. & Krueger, C. R. (1973). Effect of establishment method, variety, and seeding rate on the production and quality of alfalfa under dryland and irrigation. Agronomy Journal 65, 755–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilcher, M. R. & Heinrichs, D. H. (1969). Influence of row spacing on yield and creeping root development of Rambler alfalfa in a semiarid region. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 49, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, D. E. (1988). Alfalfa persistence and yield in high density stands. Crop Science 28, 491–494.Google Scholar
Rumbaugh, M. D. (1963). Effects of population density on some components of yield of alfalfa. Crop Science 3, 423–424.Google Scholar
Sheaffer, C. C., Lacefield, G. D. & Marble, V. L. (1988).Cutting schedules and stands. In Alfalfa and Alfalfa Improvement (Eds Hanson, A. A., Barnes, D. K. & Hill, R. R.), pp. 411–437. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System Institute (1985). SAS User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edn, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. (1991). Effects of stand age on agronomic, morphological and chemical characteristics of alfalfa. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. J. & Stout, D. G. (1993). Influence of three commercial seed coatings on alfalfa seedling emergence, nodulation, and yield. Journal of Seed Technology 16, 9–16.Google Scholar
Volenec, J. J., Cherney, J. H. & Johnson, K. D. (1987). Yield components, plant morphology, and forage quality of alfalfa as influenced by plant population. Crop Science 27, 321–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wakefield, R. C. & Skaland, N. (1965). Effects of seeding rate and chemical weed control on establishment and subsequent growth of alfalfa (Medicago saliva L.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.). Agronomy Journal 57, 547–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J. H. (1974). Biostatistical Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar