Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T22:13:40.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

High Level Cereal Diets for the Growing/Finishing Pig: VII. The Performance Of Weaned Pigs Grown To Cutter Weight (160 lb live weight) on Iso-Nitrogenous-Maize Based Diets Containing Different Levels of Lysine and Tryptophan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. L. J. Lawrence
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Veterinary Field Station, Neston, Wirral, Cheshire, £64 7TE

Summary

In a randomized block 3x2 factorial experiment 72 Large White type weaner pigs were individually and restrictedly fed, from 501b (22–7 kg) to approximately 1601b (72–7 kg) live weight, iso-nitrogenous (16% crude protein) maize-based diets (as wet mashes with 2:1 ratios of water to dry food) containing 0–15%, 0–22% or 0–29% tryptophan and either 0–85% or 0–97% lysine. Overall, for the period in its entirety and in the period from the start to 110 lb (50–0 kg) live weight, the diets containing 0–22% and 0–29% tryptophan gave a similar performance. Together they gave a significantly superior performance compared with that obtained from the diets containing 0–15 % tryptophan. Pigs fed the diets containing 0–85 % lysine converted their food better and grew faster than pigs fed the diets containing 0–97 % lysine. These differences were significant (P <0–05) for both parameters in the period from 110 lb (50–0 kg) live weight to the finish of the experiment at 1601b (72–5 kg) live weight and significant (P <0–05) for efficiency of food conversion in the overall experimental period.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, D. H., Becker, D. E., Norton, H. W., Jensen, A. H. & Harmon, B. G. (1969). Lysine imbalance of corn protein in the growing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 28, 23–6.Google Scholar
D'Mello, J. P. F. & Lewis, D. (1970a). Amino acid interactions in chick nutrition I. The inter-relationship between lysine and arginine. Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 299311.Google Scholar
D'Mello, J. P. F. & Lewis, D. (1970b). Amino acid interactions in chick nutrition. II. Inter-relationships between leucine, isoleucins and valine. Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 313–23.Google Scholar
D'Mello, J. P. F. & Lewis, D. (1970C). Amino acid interactions in chick nutrition. III. Interdependence in amino acid requirements. Br. Poult. Sci. 11, 367–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1970). High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. IV. A comparison at two slaughter weights (120 and 200 lb.) of diets containing high levels of maize, sorghum, wheat and barley. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 539–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1971). High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. V. A comparison of finisher diets containing high levels of maize or barley with wide or narrow calorie/protein/lysine ratios when fed to give two different calorie intakes. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 73, 443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, T. L. J. (1972). High level cereal diets for the growing/finishing pig. VI. An evaluation of flaked maize, wheat and barley when included in the diet of the weaned pig grown to cutter weight (160 lb.). J. agric. Sci., Camb. 79, 155–60.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1965). The concept of agent and target in amino acid interactions. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 24, 196202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockland, W. L., Meade, R. J. & Nordstrom, J. W. (1971). Lysine, methionine and tryptophan supplementation of a corn-meat and bone meal diet for growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32, 262–7.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M. & Keller, J. (1967). Utilisation energetique, par le rat en croissance, des principales céréales composant des régimes isoazotes et équilibres en acides amines. Annls Zootech. 16, 223–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar