Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T00:29:18.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The growth of hill lambs on herbage diets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Richard H. Armstrong  and
J. Eadie
Richard H. Armstrong
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J. Eadie
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organisation, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Early-weaned lambs were penned indoors for 6 weeks and individually fed to appetite on cold-stored ryegrass (Lolium perenne) or indigenous Agrostis-Festuca herbage of differing maturity. In another experiment similar lambs grazed for 12 weeks on swards of perennial ryegrass or Agrostis-Festuca. Live-weight gain (LWG), herbage organic-matter intake (OMI) and digestibility (OMD) were measured. In the indoor experiment ryegrass was 4–6 percentage units higher in OMD than was Agrostis-Festuca;first harvests were superior to later harvests by the same amount. The intake of ryegrass was 22% greater than that of Agrostis-Festuca. The correlation between OMI/W'73 and herbage cell-wall constituents was —0·80, and that between OMI/W'3 and OMD was 0·78. OMI/W0·73 increased progressively up to about 13 weeks of age.

LWG was higher on ryegrass than on Agrostis-Festuca; and LWG on the early harvests of each herbage type exceeded those on the later harvests. LWG was significantly correlated with the intake of digested organic matter (DOMI) (r = 0·85).

In the grazing experiment, OMD, OMI and LWG were all lower than in the indoor experiment. LWG on ryegrass was again superior to that on Agrostis-Festuca, and the difference was partly explained by the relationship between DOMI and LWG which had been established indoors.

These results suggest that the increase in the growth rates of hill lambs consequent on the improvement of indigenous Agrostis-Festucaswards would be less than that due to the provision of sown pastures of perennial ryegrass.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 683 - 692
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, R. H. & Eadie, J. (1974). Some aspects of the growth of hill lambs. Report of Hill Farming Research Organisation 6, 57–68.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium on Energy Metabolism. European Association of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. G., Phillips, D. S. M. & O'Reilly, E. D. (1962). An electronic instrument for pasture yield estimation. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17, 89–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demarquilly, C., Boisseau, J. M. & Cuylle, G. (1966). Factors affecting the voluntary intake of green forage by sheep. Proceedings of the IXth International Grassland Congress, pp. 877–85.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. (1967). The nutrition of grazing hill sheep: utilisation of hill pastures. Report of Hill Farming Research Organisation 4, 38–45.Google Scholar
Eadie, J. (1971). Hill pastoral resources and sheep production. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 30, 204–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eadie, J. & Black, J. S. (1968). Herbage utilisation on hill pastures. In Hill Land Productivity. Occasional Symposium of the British Grassland Society 4, 191–5.Google Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Corbett, J. L. (1960). The direct estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. I. Nitrogen and chromogen as faecal index substances. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 371–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, J. F. D., Corbett, J. L. & McDonald, I. W. (1960). The indirect estimation of the digestibility of pasture herbage. II. Regressions of digestibility on faecal nitrogen concentration; their determination in continuous digestibility trials and effect of various factors on their accuracy. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 55, 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadjipieris, G., Jones, J. G. W. & Holmes, W. (1965). The effect of age and live weight on the feed intake of grazing wether sheep. Animal Production 7, 309–17.Google Scholar
Idle, A. A. (1975). Grassland surveys in England 1939–1959. Journal of British Grassland Society 30, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jamieson, W. S. (1975). Studies on the herbage intake and grazing behaviour of cattle and sheep. Ph. D. thesis, University of Heading.Google Scholar
King, J. & Nicholson, I. A. (1964). The Vegetation of Scotland; Grassland of the Forests and Subalpine Zones (ed. Burnett, J. H.). Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Lancaster, R. J. (1949). Estimation of digestibility of grazed pasture from faeces nitrogen. Nature, London 163, 330–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Large, R. V. (1964). The development of the lamb with particular reference to the alimentary tract. Animal Production 6, 169–78.Google Scholar
Macrae, J. C. & Ulyatt, M. J. (1974). Quantitative digestion of fresh herbage by sheep. II. The sites of digestion of some nitrogenous constituents. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 82, 309–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, J. C., Campbell, D. R. & Eadie, J. (1975). Changes in the biochemical composition of herbage upon freezing and thawing. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, J. W., Thomson, G. G., Iverson, C. B., Jagusch, K. T. & Lawson, B. M. (1962). Sheep production and health on pure species pastures. Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the New Zealand Grassland Association, pp. 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, D. J., Harris, C. E., Raymond, W. F. & Milford, R. (1964). The digestibility and voluntary intake of S. 22 and H. I. ryegrass, S. 170 tall fescue, S. 28 timothy, S. 215 meadow fescue and germinal cocksfoot. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourn, D. F. (1970). The voluntary intake of forage crops by sheep. Ph. D. thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Osbourn, D. F., Terry, R. A., Outen, G. E. & Cammell, S. B. (1974). The significance of a determination of cell walls as a rational basis for the nutritive evaluation of forages. Proceedings of the XIIth International Grassland Congress, part II, pp. 514–19.Google Scholar
Owen, J. B. (1957). A study of the lactation and growth of hill sheep in their native environment and under lowland conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 48, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1967). The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes and on the growth of their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 365–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N. (1968). Lactation studies with Blackface ewes and their lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1966). The Growth of Cereals and Grasses (ed. Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 259–71. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F. (1969). The nutritive value of forage crops. In Advances in Agronomy (ed. Brady, N. C.), 21, 1–108. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Harris, C. E. & Harker, V. G. (1953). Studies in the digestibility of herbage. II. The effect of freezing and storing on its digestibility by sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 7, 315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Harris, C. E. & Kemp, C. D. (1954a). Studies in the digestibility of herbage. V. The variation with age of the ability of sheep to digest herbage. Journal of the British Grassland Society 9, 209–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Kemp, C. D., Kemp, A. W. & Harris, C. E. (1954b). Studies in the digestibility of herbage. IV. The use of faecal collection and chemical analysis in pasture studies: (b)Faecal index methods. Journal of the British Grassland Society 9, 68–82.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Minson, D. J. & Harris, C. E. (1956). The effect of management on herbage consumption and selective grazing. Proceedings of the 1th International Grassland Congress, Palmerston, New Zealand, pp. 123–33.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1956). Statistical Methods, 5th edition. Ames, Iowa, U. S. A.: Iowa State College Press.Google Scholar
Sonneveld, A. (1965). Dry matter intake of cattle fed on grass. In Grassland Problems in the U. K. and the Netherlands. Technical Report No. 1, Grassland Research Institute, 1–3.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829–35.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1965). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. III. Study of effects of heating and drying on yield of fibre and lignin in forages. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 48, 785–90.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1967). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell wall constituents. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 50, 50.Google Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1971). Factors limiting the intake of feed by sheep. V. Feed intake and the productive performance of the ruminant lamb in relation to the quantity of crude protein digested in the intestines. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 307–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar