Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:19:21.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The grazing animal and sward productivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. D. Herriott  and
D. A. Wells
J. B. D. Herriott
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture
D. A. Wells
Affiliation:
Edinburgh School of Agriculture
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The results of a trial designed to investigate the effects of sheep excreta on sward growth and yield are described.

2. The quantities of plant nutrients excreted, and their distribution, by the grazing animal are discussed. An assessment is made of the value of excreta to pasture growth in the light of the results gained.

3. Under Boghall conditions, the return of excreta had little affect on sward output, the main effect was for the pasture to become progressively more grass dominant. In general, weather and soil nutrient limitation had a greater effect on nitrogen yields from the swards than did excreta. Recovery of excreta nitrogen would appear to be influenced by rainfall and the age of the sward.

4. On a soil inherently low in available potassium, it was found that this element and nitrogen both affected the pattern of herbage growth and composition when returned in excreta. Phosphorus return by the sheep was, however, of no observable value in either the levels of the element in the soil or in the herbage. It was found that rainfall and the botanical composition influenced the contents of mineral elements in the herbages.

5. Balance studies suggest that sheep grazed in small paddocks need adequate pre-conditioning before being moved into a trial. Only by this means can return of excreta reflect consumption of herbage. The limitations of small-scale animal grazing experiments are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 61 , Issue 1 , August 1963 , pp. 89 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 35 A, Suppl. 1.Google Scholar
Balch, C. C. (1950). Brit. J. Nutr. 4, 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Graham, N. McC. & Wainman, F. W. (1956). Brit. J. Nutr. 10, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak, B. W. (1952). J. Agric. Sci. 42, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fertilizers and Feeding Stuffs Regulations (1960). Statutory Instruments, no. 1165, Agriculture.Google Scholar
Green, J. O. & Cowling, D. W. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassl. Congr. Paper 5 A/1 126.Google Scholar
Herriott, J. B. D., Wells, D. A. & Dilnot, J. (1959). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 14, 191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herriott, J. B. D. & Wells, D. A. (1962). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. (In the Press).Google Scholar
Lenkeit, W. (1932). Berl. tierärztl. Wschr. 48, 17.Google Scholar
McMeekan, C. P. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassl. Congr. Plenary paper 21.Google Scholar
Metson, A. J. & Hurst, F. B. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 35 A, 327.Google Scholar
Peterson, R. G., Lucas, H. L. & Woodhouse, W. W. Jr. (1956). J. Agron. 48, 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. G., Woodhouse, W. W. Jr. & Lucas, H. L. (1956). J. Agron. 48, 444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piper, C. S. (1942). Soil and Plant Analysis. University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Raymond, W. F., Kemp, C. D., Kemp, A. W. & Harris, C. E. (1954). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, 69.Google Scholar
Reith, J. W. S. & Inkson, R. H. E. (1961). J. Agric. Sci. 56, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, P. D. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 35 A, 221.Google Scholar
Simpson, K. (1961). Soil Sci. 92, 1.Google Scholar
Watkins, B. R. (1954). J, Brit. Grassl. Soc. 9, no. 1, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watkins, B. R. (1957). J.Brit.Grassl. Soc. 12, no. 4, 264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, S. J., Procter, J. & Ferguson, W. S. (1932). J. Agric. Sci. 22, 257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar