Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T19:59:46.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotypic variation in inflorescence length in Phleum pratense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. W. Bean
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station

Summary

Measurement of the variation in reproductive characters between genotypes of Phleum pratense showed that inflorescence length had a significant variance and was correlated with seed yield/plant. Genotypes with the longer inflorescences showed a quicker response to a long photoperiod and had a longer period of inflorescence development, and there was an indication that selection for increased inflorescence length might affect the production of leaves. A genetic analysis of a 6 x 6 half diallel cross showed that additive and non-additive effects were evident in the control of inflorescence length under natural conditions, but the non-additive effects were almost entirely suppressed under glasshouse conditions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bucio Alanis, L. & Hill, J. (1966). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, Lond. 21, 399405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, I. T. & Moll, R. H. (1962). Phenotypic and genotypic variation and covariation in quantitative characters in strains of orchard grass. Crop Sci. 2, 281–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, J. P. & Edwards, K. J. R. (1960). Selection for leaf area in ryegrass. Rep. Welsh Pl. Breed. Stn for 1959, pp. 71–5.Google Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1960). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, pp. 317–18. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Griffing, B. (1956). Concept of general and specific combining ability in relation to diallel crossing systems. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 9, 463–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar