Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T07:20:10.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genotype-environment interactions in fodder kale (Brassica oleracea L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Bradshaw
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
I. M. Chapman
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF
A. Young
Affiliation:
Scottish Crop Research Institute, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian, EH25 9RF

Summary

Two potential new kale cultivars were compared with five control cultivars in 12 trials involving five sites in the north of England and the south of Scotland, 2 years, and a range of sowing and harvest dates.

The differences between cultivars were small for dry-matter and digestible organic-matter yield. Genotype-environment interactions were relatively large by comparison and hence only tentative estimates could be made of relative yield performance in a wider range of environments. However, the set of trials was satisfactory for determining the heights, dry-matter contents and digestible organic-matter contents of the cultivars despite the presence of statistically significant genotype-environment interactions.

Joint regression analyses revealed that the two cultivars with the lowest mean freshweight yields were also the least responsive to environmental change and that environments resulting in low digestible organic-matter contents were best for discriminating between cultivars.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, M. J. & Borzucki, R. (1978). Cellulase methods for the efficient digestion of grasses and brassicas. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29, 293297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bastiman, B. & Slade, C. F. R. (1978). The utilisation of forage crops – a review of recent work undertaken by ADAS. ADAS Quarterly Review 28, 111.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. E. (1981 a). The effects of cultivar, sowing date and plant spacing on the yield and quality of fodder kale (Brassica oleracea L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 633637.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, J. E. (1981 b). Scottish Plant Breeding Station Annual Report 1980–81, pp. 6567.Google Scholar
Coppock, J. T. (1976 a). An Agricultural Atlas of England and Wales. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Coppock, J. T. (1976 b). An Agricultural Atlas of Scotland. Edinburgh: John Donald.Google Scholar
Dent, J. W. & Willey, L. A. (1976). Results of the systematic quality testing of fodder crops. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 14, 3948.Google Scholar
Freeman, G. H. (1973). Statistical methods for the analysis of genotype—environment interactions. Heredity 31, 339354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, J. (1975). Genotype-environment interactions – a challenge for plant breeding. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 477493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, T. D. (1971). The effects of plant density and fertilizer application on yield components in three marrow-stem kale (Brassica oleracea L.) varieties. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 8389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimber, D. S. (1977). Variety Testing for National and Recommended Lists in England and Wales. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 14, 306311.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1981). Genotype (G), environment (E) and GE components of crop yields. Experimental Agriculture 17, 355362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, K. F. (1967). Breeding problems in kale (Brassica oleracea) with particular reference to marrow-stem kale. Report of Plant Breeding Institute 1965–66, pp. 734.Google Scholar