Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T19:29:54.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genotype x environment interactions in mixtures of herbage grasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. England
F. England
Affiliation:
Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Penilandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The technique of regression on environmental index is used to examine the behaviour of varieties in monoculture and mixture. It is shown that, sometimes, single regressions for each variety do not provide an adequate explanation of the interactions between varieties and environments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 82 , Issue 2 , April 1974 , pp. 371 - 376
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Breese, E. L. (1969). The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucio-Alanis, L. (1966). Environmental and genotype environmental components of variability. I. Inbred lines. Heredity 21, 387–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
England, F. (1968). Competition in mixtures of herbage grasses. Journal of Applied Ecology 5, 227–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 742–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fripp, Yvonne J. & Caten, C. E. (1971). Genotypeenvironmental interactions in SchizophyUum commune. I. Analysis and character. Heredity 27, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, J. (1973). Methods of analysing competition with special reference to herbage plants. II. Effects of associate plants. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 91–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquard, P. & Caputa, J. (1970). Comparaison de trois modèles d'analyse des relations sociales entre espèces végétales. Annales d'Amélioration des Plantes 20, 115–58.Google Scholar
Yates, F. & Cochran, W. G. (1938). The analysis of groups of experiments. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 28, 556–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar