Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T01:26:04.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further comparisons of energy and protein sources for growing cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Smith ,
J. W. Siviter  and
R. J. Merry
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9AT
J. W. Siviter
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9AT
R. J. Merry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading, RO2 9AT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Spring-barley straw or maize silage were the major components in mixed diets of compound and forage fed to yearling dairy heifers. With straw, rolled barley was fed either alone or with fishmeal, soya-bean meal, protected soya-bean meal, whey + urea or Ewoplua (a product made from whey and rich in lactosyl urea). With maize silage the rolled barley was fed either alone or with fishmeal, whey + urea or Ewoplus.

When straw was included in the diet fishmeal and protected soya-bean meal increased live-weight gain, and all the supplements increased nitrogen retention. When maize silage was fed, only fishmeal increased live-weight gain although all the supplements increased digestibility. Concentrations of rumen NH3-N were increased by all the supplements, when fed with straw, and also by maize silage when fed without an N supplement or with fishmeal. Small changes were noted in total and molar proportions of VFA.

Calculated ME intakes suggested a more efficient use of energy for growth from maize silage than from straw, except when the straw diet was supplemented with fishmeal.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 3 , June 1985 , pp. 485 - 491
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. & Pbescott, J. H. D. (1971). In Lactation. Amount, Physical Form and Composition of Feed and Milk Secretion in the Dairy Cow. Proceedings 17th Easter School, University of Nottingham (ed. Falconer, L. R.), pp. 349–371. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Bines, J. A. & Balch, C. C. (1973). Relative retentions of the nitrogen of urea and ground nut in iso-energetic diets for growing heifers. British Journal of Nutrition 29, 466–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Clough, P. A., Hodgson-Jones, L. & Smith, T. (1974). Some observations on the nutritive value of maize silage for dairy cattle. Maize Bulletin 62, 14–18.Google Scholar
Burris, W. R., Boling, J. A., Bradley, N. W. & Ludwick, R. L. (1974). Preformed protein sources in steer finishing rations. Journal of Animal Science 39, 818–823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocimano, M. R. & Leng, R. A. (1967). Metabolism of urea in sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ekern, A. (1982). Results from feeding trials and practical experience concerning protein feeding of ruminants in Norway. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Es, A. J. H. van), pp. 86–102. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foldagbr, J., Sejrsen, K. & Larsen, J. B. (1980) Milk Production in Heifers Reared on Ad Libitum Intake of Rations with Different Energy Concentrations. EAAP Energy Symposium in Munich.Google Scholar
Grenet, E. & Demarquilly, C. (1983). The nitrogen value of lactosyl urea for ruminants. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Pion, R., Arnal, M. and Bonin, D.), pp. 329–332. Paris: INRA.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. (1978). Effects of variations in energy and protein intake on digestibility, nitrogen balance and carcass composition in British Friesian castrate male cattle. Animal Production 26, 233–243.Google Scholar
Hoveix, F. D. De B., Ørskov, E. R., Grubb, D. A. & MacLeod, N. A. (1983). Basal urinary nitrogen excretion and growth response to supplemental protein by lambs close to energy equilibrium. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 173–187.Google Scholar
Kay, M. & MacDearmid, A. (1972). A note on the need for supplementary nitrogen in diets for fattening beef cattle. Animal Production 14, 367–369.Google Scholar
Leaver, J. D. (1978). Utilization of maize silage by dairy herd replacements. In Forage Maize Production and Utilization (ed. Bunting, E. S.), pp. 297–307. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1983 a). Factors influencing the digestion of dietary carbohydrates between the mouth and abomasum of steers. British Journal of Nutrition 50, 445–454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllan, A. B. & Smith, R. H. (1983 b). The efficiency of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen and the degradability of feed nitrogen between the mouth and abomasum in steers given different diets. British Journal of Nutrition 51, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, R. J., Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1982 a). Glycosyl ureides in ruminant nutrition. 1. Preparation and estimation of lactosyl urea and other glycosyl ureides. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merry, R. J., Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1982 b). Glycosyl ureides in ruminant nutrition. 2. In vitro studies on the metabolism of glycosyl ureides and their free component molecules in rumen contents. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 287–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merry, R. J., Smith, R. H. & McAllan, A. B. (1982 c) Glycosyl ureides in ruminant nutrition. 3. In vivo studies on the metabolism of glycosyl ureides and corresponding mixtures of their free component molecules. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 305–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, C. A. & Fursey, G. A. J. (1974). A note on the velocity of ultrasound in living tissue. Animal Production 18, 93–96.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1975). Energy Allowances and Feeding Systems for Ruminants. Technical Bulletin No. 33. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Oldham, J. D. & Smith, T. (1982). Protein-energy interrelationships for growing and for lactating cattle. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants (ed. Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Es, A. J. H. van), pp. 103–130. London: Butterworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J. H. B., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Orskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of the N-requirement for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, EAAP Publication No. 22 (ed. Tamminga, S.), pp. 126–129. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
, Schingoethe (1976). Whey utilization in animal feeding: a summary and evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 556–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (1979). The collection of faeces and urine from steers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 215–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980). A comparison of sburces of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre-rich diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H. & Siviter, J. W. (1980). An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Grigera-Naon, J. J., Broster, W. H. & Siviter, J. W. (1984). Ammonia versus sodium hydroxide treatment of straw for growing cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Siviter, J. W. & Broster, W. H. (1983). A comparison of two methods of NaOH treatment of spring barley straw with untreated straw and hay. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1966). Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Agriculture and Biology, 5th ed. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, C., Wilson, R. F., Wilkins, R. J. & Wilkinson, J. M. (1975). The utilization of maize silage for intensive beef production. II. The effect of urea on silage fermentation and on the voluntary intake and performance of young cattle fed maize silage-based diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 365–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar