Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T23:34:26.760Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of added dietary lipid on the body composition of rams and wethers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. A. Price
M. A. Price
Affiliation:
Department of Livestock Production, University of New England, Armidale, N.S.W. 2351, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A 2 × 3 factorial trial designed to investigate the effects of castration and three diets on growth and body composition of 30 male Dorset Horn × (Border Leicester × Merino) lambs is described. The three diets were: (a) a standard ration of equal weights of lucerne chaff and pelleted concentrates; (b) a similar ration to (a) plus 7·5% by weight of lipid (peanut oil and tallow); (c) a greater ration of (a) calculated to be isocaloric for digestible energy with diet (b).

At the beginning of the trial a group of 40 lambs (20 rams, 20 wethers) were shorn and five rams and five wethers were selected at random and slaughtered to establish initial body composition. The remaining 30 lambs, 15 rams and 15 wethers aged about 22 weeks and having mean weights of 33·0 kg (rams) and 31·2 kg (wethers), were randomly divided within sex into three groups and allocated to the three diets for 92 days. At the end of this period the lambs were again shorn, and then slaughtered and dressed.

During the trial, rams gained significantly (P < 0·001) more weight than wethers, and lambs on diet (a) gained significantly (P < 0·01) less weight than those on (b) and (c). Weight gains on the latter two diets were similar. Diet generally had little effect on body composition, although there was a tendency, within sexes, for lambs on diet (b) to have a greater fat content than those on the other diets. Rams had significantly greater carcass weights (P < 0·01), head percentage (P < 0·001) and various m. longissimus dorsi dimensions than wethers, but significantly less fat in all the locations measured, including a lower percentage of chemically extractible fat in the offals and carcasses. Estimations of the energy stored in the wool-free body during the trial indicated that wethers stored significantly more energy in the form of fat than rams (P < 0·001), but that rams stored significantly more non-fat energy than wethers (P < 0·001). It is concluded that a maximum growth rate exists for the non-fat body, and that it is higher in rams than wethers. Thus the addition of dietary lipid (which increases energy intake with comparatively small increases in weight or volume of feed), is more likely to promote fat deposition in wethers, which have a lower maximum capacity for non-fat storage, than in rams.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 2 , April 1975 , pp. 201 - 208
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bensadoun, A. & Reid, J. T. (1965). Effect of physical form, composition and level of intake of diet on the fatty acid composition of the sheep carcase. Journal of Nutrition 87, 239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. (1968). Genetic and environmental influences on growth in beef cattle. In Growth and Development of Mammals (ed. Lodge, G. A. and Lamming, G. E.). London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1966). Muscle:bone ratio and fat percentage as measures of beef carcase composition. Animal Production 8, 1–11.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1961). Energy utilization in the ruminant. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant (ed. Lewis, D.), London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1970). Methods of measuring the energy metabolism of animals and interpretation of results obtained. Federation Proceedings 30, 1436–43.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1966). Relative growth in beef cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal 42, 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emery, R. S. (1969). Lipids and adipose tissue. In Animal Growth and Nutrition (ed. Hafez, E. S. E. and Dyer, I. A.). Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.Google Scholar
Gee, Isoline & Preston, T. R. (1957). The effect of hexoestrol implantation on carcase composition and efficiency of food utilization of fattening lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 11, 329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrard, F. (1971). Meat Technology, 4th edn.London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in Sheep: a survey of the problems involved in meat production. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Kirton, A. H. (1970). Effect of preweaning plane of nutrition on subsequent growth and carcase quality of lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 30, 106–15.Google Scholar
Krebs, H. A. (1960). Arneimittel-Forsch 10, 369. Quoted by Blaxter (1970).Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Sutherland, H. A. M. (1969). An estimate of the nutrients utilized for livoweight gain by Merino sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 23, 603–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Preston, T. R. & Gee, Isoline (1957). Effect of hexoestrol on carcase composition and efficiency of food utilization in fattening lambs. Nature, London 179, 247–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. A. & Yeates, N. T. M. (1971 a). Infertile bulls versus steers. I. The influence of level of nutrition on relative growth rate. Journal of agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 307–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. A. & Yeates, N. T. M. (1971 b). Infertile bulls versus steers. II. Feed conversion efficiency and the effects of a high fat diet. Journal of agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 313–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, D. N. (Ed.) (1969). Meat Production from Entire Male Animals. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Paver, H. & Wilson, J. C. (1970). Effect of castration and dietary protein level on growth and carcase composition in beef cattle. Journal of agricultural Science, Cambridge 74, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, I. S., Wilson, J. C. & Paver, H. (1966). A comparison of bulls and steers on three levels of dietary protein. Ninth international Congress of Animal Production, Edinburgh, p. 82.Google Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. 6th edn. (Ames: Iowa State University Press).Google Scholar