Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:10:37.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of variation in the storage temperature of seed potatoes on sprout growth and subsequent yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. C. E. Wurr
D. C. E. Wurr
Affiliation:
National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne, Warwickshire CV 35 9EF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments, conducted over 3 years, investigated the effect of all combinations of two storage periods at low temperature (0 or 2 °C) and two storage periods at 10 °C on the sprout growth, numbers of stems per tuber, foliage development and subsequent tuber yield of the two maincrop varieties Maris Piper and Désirée.

Although the number of day-degrees accumulated during sprouting was the same for all treatment combinations, there were large effects of treatments on the number of sproutlets per tuber and the total sprout length per tuber. However, there was no effect on the number of stems per tuber, foliage development or saleable ware yield inany year.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 93 , Issue 3 , December 1979 , pp. 619 - 622
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burton, W. G. (1963). Concepts and mechanism of dormancy. In The Growth of the Potato (ed. Ivins, J. D. and Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 17–41. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Gunn, J. S. (1978). Achieving maximum yields of potatoes in the United Kingdom. A review of work by the Agricultural Development and Advisory Service in England and Wales. Proceedings of the Seventh Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, 1978, pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
Headford, D. W. B. (1962). Sprout development and subsequent plant growth. European Potato Journal 5, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krijthe, N. (1962). Observations on the sprouting of seed potatoes. European Potato Journal 5, 316–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, D. A. (1966). Intersprout competition in the potato. I. Effects of tuber size, sprout number and temperature on sprout growth during storage. European Potato Journal 9, 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, J. (1969). Mini-sprouted seed needs growing time. Arable Farmer 4, No. 2, 42–43.Google Scholar
O'Bbrien, P. J. & Allen, E. J. (1978). The relationships between storage temperature of seed tubers and tuber yields. Proceedings of the Seventh Triennial Conference of the European Association for Potato Research, 1978, pp. 18–19.Google Scholar
Thomas, T. H. & Wurr, D. C. E. (1976). Gibberellin and growth inhibitor changes in potato tuber buds in response to cold treatment. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 317–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toosey, R. D. (1964). The pro-sprouting of seed potatoes: factors affecting sprout growthand subsequent yield. Part I. Field Crop Abstracts 17, 161–168.Google Scholar
Vale, R. (1976). Glad ho tried the blueprint. Arable Farming 3, No. 2, 53–55.Google Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978 a). Studies of the measurement and interpretation of potato sprout growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978 b). The effects of the date of defoliation of the seed potato crop and the storage temperature of the seed on subsequent growth. 1. Sprout growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 737–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurr, D. C. E. (1978 C). The effects of the date of defoliation of the seed potato crop and the storage temperature of the seed on subsequent growth. 2. Field growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 747–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar