Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-20T16:28:37.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of rearing type and prepartum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyface ewes at pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. J. Maxwell ,
J. M. Doney ,
J. A. Milne ,
J. N. Peart ,
A. J. F. Russel ,
A. R. Sibbald  and
D. MacDonald
T. J. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J. M. Doney
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J. A. Milne
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
J. N. Peart
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
A. J. F. Russel
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
A. R. Sibbald
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
D. MacDonald
Affiliation:
Hill Farming Research Organization, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OPY
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Eleven single-rearing and 14 twin-rearing Greyface (Border-Leicester × Scottish Blackface) ewes which had previously been individually fed indoors on three nutritional treatments (treatment 1, adequately nourished; treatment 2, moderately undernourished; treatment 3, severely undernourished) during the final 6 weeks of pregnancy, were subsequently grazed with eight non-lactating Greyface ewes on a ryegrass–white clover pasture for the first 14 weeks of lactation.

Herbage organic matter (OM) intakes and milk yields of ewes were measured weekly and the herbage OM intakes of lambs from week 7 of lactation.

Mean daily OM intakes were 36·6 (± 1·09), 38·9 (± 0·99) and 26·4 (± 0·93) g OM/kg body-weight for single- and twin-rearing, and non-lactating ewes respectively. Prepartum nutrition had no effect on intake. Maximum intakes were achieved in week 5 for twin-rearing ewes (53 g OM/kg) and week 4 for single and non-lactating ewes (54 and 38 g OM/kg respectively).

Mean daily weight gains over the period for single-, twin-rearing and non-lactating ewes were 89 (±22·2), 73 (±16·1) and 182 (±22·5)g respectively. There were no differences due to prepartum treatment.

There were significant differences (P < 0·05) in milk production between singleand twin-rearing ewes in the first 5 weeks of lactation. Twin-rearing ewes of prepartum treatment 1 produced consistently more milk in weeks 2, 3 and 4 of lactation, whereas ewes from treatment 3 tended to produce more milk than ewes from the other treatment groups thereafter.

Milk intakes of single lambs were always significantly greater than individual twin lambs, and single lambs ate significantly less grass during the herbage OM intake measurement period from week 7; their growth rates up to week 7 were also significantly greater.

No differences in the intake or growth rate of lambs could be attributed to the prepartum nutritional treatment of their dams.

Ewe maintenance requirements during lactation were estimated to be 242 (± 35·1) kJ ME/kg body weight/day; the efficiency with which ME was used for milk production to be 59%; and the efficiency with which ME was used for body-weight gain, 53%.

Lamb maintenance requirements were estimated to be 427 (± 143) kJ ME/kg W in weeks 1 and 2 of lactation and 287 (± 44·2) kJ/kg from week 7. Efficiency of utilization of energy for body-weight gain in each period was estimated to be 71 and 80% respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 1 , February 1979 , pp. 165 - 174
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock, no. 2. Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Alexander, R. H. & McGowan, M. (1966). The routine determination of in vitro digestibility of organic matter in forages – an investigation of the problem associated with continuous large scale operation. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 140–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, G. W. (1964). Responses of lambs to differing pasture conditions. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Animal Production 5, 275–279.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. W. & Dudzinski, M. L. (1967). Studies on the diet of the grazing animal. II. The effect of physiological status in ewes and pasture availability on herbage intake. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnicoat, C. R., Logan, A. G. & Grant, A. I. (1949). Milk secretion studies with New Zealand Romney ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 39, 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, G. M. (1975). The effect of variation in physical production factors on the profitability of upland sheep production. East of Scotland College of Agriculture Report to MLC.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1961). Utilization of food by sheep and cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 57, 419–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, J. Z. (1972). A note on the effect of body condition on the voluntary intake of grass wafers by Scottish Blackface ewes. Animal Production 14, 131–134.Google Scholar
Foot, J. Z. & Russel, A. J. F. (1978). Pattern of intake of three roughage diets by non-pregnant, nonlactating Scottish Blackface ewes over a long period and the effects of previous nutritional history on current intake. Animal Production 26, 203–215.Google Scholar
Forbes, J. M. (1977). Interrelationships between physical and metabolic control of voluntary food intake in fattening pregnant and lactating mature sheep: a model. Animal Production 24, 91–101.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Hogue, D. E. (1963). Studies on the TDN requirements of pregnant and lactating ewes. Journal of Animal Science 22, 410–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, R. W. & Hoque, D. E. (1964). The effects of energy intake and number of lambs suckled on milk yield, milk composition and energetic efficiency of lactating ewes. Journal of Animal Science 23, 935–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1976). The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of lambs grazing perennial ryegrass and red clover swards. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1978). The effect of herbage allowance on herbage intake and performance of ewes and their twin lambs grazing perennial ryegrass. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 139–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1964). Energy exchanges of pregnant and lactating ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 127.Google Scholar
Hadjipieris, G. & Holmes, W. (1966). Studies on feed intake and feed utilization by sheep. I. The voluntary feed intake of dry, pregnant and lactating ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1975). The consumption of perennial ryegrass (var. S24) and red clover (var. Hungaropoly) by grazing sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 30, 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Bennet, I. L. (1973). Stocking intensity and pastoral production. III. Wool production, fleece characteristics, and the utilization of nutrients for maintenance and wool growth by Merino sheep grazed at different stocking rates. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 81, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1975). Techniques for estimating nutrient intake and its utilization by the grazing ruminant. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant (ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 320–332. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Langlands, J. P. (1977). The intake and production of lactating Merino ewes and their lambs grazed at different stocking rates. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 27, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, V. A. & Monson, W. A. (1965). X-ray spectrographic determination of chromic oxide in faeces. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 13, 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbourne, D. F. & Cammell, S. B. (1970). The effect of duration of the period of measurement and changes in condition of the animals upon the measured voluntary intake of forages. Annual Report of the Grassland Research Institute, 1969, p. 75.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Robinson, J. J. (1972). Recent advances in ewe and lamb nutrition. Report of the Rowett Research Institute 28, 116–129.Google Scholar
Peart, J. (1967). The effect of different levels of nutrition during late pregnancy on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. (1968). Some effects of liveweight and body condition on the milk production of Blackface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. (1970). The influence of live weight and body condition on the subsequent milk production of Blackface ewes following a period of undernourishment in early lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 459–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peart, J. N., Edwards, R. A. & Donaldson, E. (1972). The yield and composition of the milk of Finnish Landrace x Blackface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 79, 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. (1977). Response of the lactating ewe to variation in energy and protein intake. 28th Annual Meeting: European Association for Animal Production.Google Scholar
Roy, J. B. H., Balch, C. C., Miller, E. L., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, R. H. (1977). Calculation of N-requirements for ruminants from nitrogen metabolism studies. EAAP 2nd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition.Google Scholar
Russel, A. J. F., Maxwell, T. J., Sibbald, A. R. & McDonald, D. (1978). Relationships between energy intake, nutritional state and lamb birth weight in Greyface ewes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 667–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitrodigestion of forage crops. Journal of British Qrassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1971). The effects of nutrition in pregnancy and lactation on milk yield in ewes. Animal Production 13, 493–501.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1977). The effects on milk production of the number of lambs suckled and age, parity and size of ewe. European Association for Animal Production: 28th Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Wardrop, I. D. & Coombe, J. B. (1961). The development of rumen function in the lamb. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 12, 661–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, N. E. & Newton, J. E. (1975). A comparison between rotational grazing and set stocking with ewes and lambs at three stocking rates. Animal Production 21, 303–322.Google Scholar