Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:17:57.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of harvesting stage on cereal and legume forage production in low rainfall regions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. Hadjichristodoulou
A. Hadjichristodoulou
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of stage of harvesting on dry-matter (D.M.) yield and chemical composition of barley, wheat and the legumes common vetch (F. sativa), woollypod vetch (F. dasycarpa) and fodder peas (P. sativum) were studied in Cyprus under low rainfall conditions in a series of trials sown in four successive years. Cereals were harvested at the beginning of heading, 50% heading and the milk stage of grain, and legumes at three stages from preflowering to full pod formation, D.M., protein and digestible D.M. yields and percentage D.M. content increased with age, whereas percentage protein content and D.M. digestibility declined. Under moisture stress conditions before and during the harvesting period D.M. yields did not increase significantly with age. Protein content of cereals under low rainfall conditions was higher than that of cereals grown in the U.K. under higher N fertilization levels. Rainfall conditions affected drastically the performance of both cereals and legumes. However, average yields were satisfactory; the barley variety 628 gave 8·98 t/ha, the highest D.M. yield among all cereal and legume varieties.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 155 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlgren, A. H. (1956). Forage Crops, p. 401. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Cannell, R. Q. & Jobson, H. T. (1968). The relationship between yield and digestibility in spring varieties of barley, oats and wheat after ear emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 71, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. A., Donaldson, E. & Mac-Gregor, A. W. (1969). Ensilage of whole-crop barley. 1. Effects of variety and stage of growth. 2. Composition of barley and barley silage at different stages of growth. Herbage Abstracts 39, No. 2, 133 (Abst. No. 820).Google Scholar
Gizek, J. & Gikic, M. (1969). Influence of varietal characteristics on productivity of winter vetches (V. saliva, V. villosa and V. pinnonica). Herbage Abstracts 39, No. 3, 212 (Abst. No. 1369).Google Scholar
Gonzalez, G., Jimeno, L. & Lozano, J. M. (1967). Effects of growing barley and vetch in mixture, and of different rates of ammonium sulphate and dates of cutting on crude protein content of the forage and grain. Herbage Abstracts 37, No. 4, 274 (Abst. No. 1783).Google Scholar
Hadjichristodoulou, A. (1973). Production of forage from cereals, legumes and their mixtures under rainfed conditions in Cyprus. Technical Bulletin No. 14, Cyprus Agricultural Research Institute.Google Scholar
Lawes, D. A. & Jones, D. I. H. (1971). Yield, nutritive value and ensiling characteristics of whole-crop spring cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 76, 479–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomas, J. & Shashoua, Y. (1973). The effect of rainfall on wheat yields in an arid region. Plant Response to Climatic Factors. Proceedings Uppsala Symposium 1970, UNESCO, pp. 531–8.Google Scholar
McCarrick, R. B. (1969). Feeding hay and silage to beef cattle. Herbage Abstracts 39, No. 3, 215 (Abst. No. 1392).Google Scholar
O'Shea, J. & Wilson, R. K. (1965). Relationship between in vitro and in vivo dry matter digestibility. Irish Journal Agricultural Research 4, 236—7.Google Scholar