Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T14:07:54.141Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of drought on the water use and yield of two spring wheat genotypes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. Innes
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge
R. D. Blackwell
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge

Summary

Automatic plot covers were used in a study of the effects of drought on the yield and water use of two spring wheat genotypes. The experiment tested the effects of drought at different stages of growth on yield and yield components. There was complete control over the water supplied to the plots, and a fully irrigated control treatment was included.

The yields of the two genotypes were similar under fully irrigated conditions, but the yield components differed: Highbury had more grains per ear and TW 269/9/3/4 more ears per unit ground area and a higher mean grain mass. An early drought, which began 4 weeks before anthesis, caused a reduction in number of grains per ear in Highbury, which was outyielded by TW 269. Late drought also reduced yields differentially, reducing mean grain mass, and hence grain yield, more in TW 269 than in Highbury. Total shoot dry matter and grain yield were found generally to increase as water use increased. The average water use efficiency was found to depend upon the genotype and treatment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aamodt, O. S. & Johnston, W. H. (1936). Studies on drought resistance in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Research 14, 122152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asana, R. D., Saini, A. D. & Ray, D. (1958). Studies in physiological analysis of yield. III. The rate of grain development in wheat in relation to photosynthetic surface and soil moisture. Physiologia Plantarum 11, 655665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspinall, D., Nicholls, P. B. & May, L. H. (1964). The effect of soil moisture stress on the growth of barley. I. Vegetative development and grain yield. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 729745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, R. B. & Blackwell, R. D. (1980). Edge and neighbour effects in cereal yield trials. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 731734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, J. (1966). Variety response in wheat to water supply in the field, and male sterility caused by a period of drought in a glasshouse experiment. Annals of Applied Biology 57, 365377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, A. D. & Intlap, S. (1970). Some effects of soil moisture stress on growth of wheat. Agronomy Journal 62, 2729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawlor, D. W. & Jeffers, W. de C. (1978). A drought experiment using mobile shelters: the effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 599623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denmead, O. T. (1973). Relative significance of soil and plant evaporation in estimating evapotranspiration. In Plant Response to Climatic Factors (ed. Slatyer, R. O.). Proceedings of the Uppsala Symposium UNESCO, Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1970). The effect of water stress at various stages of development on yield processes in wheat. In Plant Response to Climatic Factors (ed. Slatyer, R. O.). Proceedings of the Uppsala Symposium UNESCO, Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. (1979). Growth and water limitation to dryland wheat yield in Australia: a physiological framework. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 45, 8394.Google Scholar
Fischer, R. A. & Maurer, R. (1978). Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 897912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, D. B. (1975). The effect of soil moisture stress (SMS) on wheat grain yields and the determination of Et/Eo ratios for estimating water use by wheat. Crop Production 4, 119124.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Brown, N. J. & Smith, G. J. (1978). Small plots and automatic rain shelters: a field appraisal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 321336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musick, J. T. & Dusek, D. A. (1980). Planting date and water deficit effects on development and yield of irrigated winter wheat. Agronomy Journal 72, 4552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 193, 120145.Google Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1962). Woburn irrigation 1951–59. Parts I, II, III. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 58, 343379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1970). Woburn irrigation 1960–68. Parts IV, V, VI. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 69102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1971). Irrigation at Woburn. Part VII. Rothamsted Experimental Station Report for 1970 Part 2, pp. 147170.Google Scholar
Ritchie, J. T. (1972). Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resources Research 8, 12041213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, J. S. & Domingo, C. E. (1962). Moisture and nitrogen effects on irrigated spring wheat. Agronomy Journal 54, 135138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Goode, J. E. (1967). Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture, East Mailing. Research Review No. 2.Google Scholar
Slatyer, R. O. (1969). Physiological significance of internal water relations to crop yield. Effect of water stress on grain yield in cereals. In Publication of the American Society of Agronomy Crop Science (ed. Eastin, J. D., Haskins, F. A., Sullivan, C. Y. and Bavel, C. H. M. Van), pp. 7179. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Van Der Paauw, F. (1949). Water relations of oats with special attention to the influence of periods of drought. Plant and Soil 1, 303341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, S. A. & Dubetz, S. (1966). Reaction of barley varieties to soil water stress. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 46, 507512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, S. A. & Dubetz, S. (1970). Reaction of two barley cultivars to a period of soil water stress during heading. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 50, 701704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar