Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T18:42:37.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Decomposition of Urea in Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Gibson
T. Gibson
Affiliation:
(Bacteriology Department, Edinburgh and East of Scotland College of Agriculture.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The decomposition of urea has been investigated in 59 soil samples of extremely varied character. Urea was decomposed readily in all and very rapidly in most of the samples.

In mountain and heath soils the decomposition was generally active, especially in soil tests. Strongly acid peat samples (pH. 3·1 to 3·3) decomposed from 0·44 to 0·86 per cent, of their own dry weights of urea in 24 hours at 22° to 23° C.

In solution and soil tests samples from permanent pastures produced a more rapid decomposition than those from cultivated land. In soil tests with pasture samples quantities of urea as large as 1 per cent, of the dry weight of soil were converted to ammonia in 24 hours at 22° to 23° C. Fertile arable soils produced a relatively slow decomposition in soil tests.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , October 1930 , pp. 550 - 559
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

(1)Beijerinck, M. W.Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1901), II Abt. 7, 33–61.Google Scholar
(2)Bierema, S.. Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1909), II Abt. 23, 672–726.Google Scholar
(3)Biilmann, E.J. Agric. Sci. (1924), 14, 232–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Brioux, C.Compt. rend. (1924), 179, 915–17.Google Scholar
(5)Couturier, F. and Perraud, S.Compt. rend. Acad. Agric. France (1925), 11, 492–6.Google Scholar
(6)Couturier, F. and Perraud, S.Compt. rend. (1925), 180, 1433–1436.Google Scholar
(7)Cowie, G. A.J. Agric. Sci. (1920), 10, 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Fisher, R. A.Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 2nd ed. (1928). Edinburgh.Google Scholar
(9)Gibson, T.Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1930), ii Abt. 81, 45–60.Google Scholar
(10)Gillespie, L. J.Soil Sci. (1920), 9, 115–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Guittonneau, G.Compt. rend. (1924), 178, 1383–5.Google Scholar
(12)Iwanoff, N. N.Biochem. Z. (1925), 157, 229–42.Google Scholar
(13)Iwanoff, N. N.Biochem. Z. (1926), 175, 181–4.Google Scholar
(14)Iwanoff, N. N. and Smirnowa, M. I.Biochem. Z. (1927), 181, 8–16.Google Scholar
(15)Jacob, K. D., Allison, F. E. and Braham, J. M.J. Agric. Res. (1924), 28, 37–69.Google Scholar
(16)Kappen, H.Landw. Versuchs-Stat. (1915), 86, 131.Google Scholar
(17)Kellner, O.Landw. Jahrb. (1886), 15, 712–17.Google Scholar
(18)König, J., Hasenbäumer, J. and Glenk, K.Landw. Versuchs-Stat. (1913), 79–80, 491–534.Google Scholar
(19)Littauer, F. Z.Pflanzenernähr. Düng. (1924), Abt. A, 3, 165–179.Google Scholar
(20)Loew, O.Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1927), ii Abt. 70, 39–41.Google Scholar
(21)Löhnis, F.Mitt, landw. Instit. Leipzig (1905), 7, 1–106.Google Scholar
(22)Löhnis, F.Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1905), ii Abt. 14, 714–23.Google Scholar
(23)Prince, A. L. and Windsor, H. W.Soil Sci. (1926), 21, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(24)Rubentschik, L.Z. Hyg. (1926), 106, 265–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(25)Smith, A. M.Soil Sci. (1927), 23, 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(26)Söhngen, N. L.Zentr. Bakt. Par. (1909), ii Abt. 23, 91–8.Google Scholar
(27)Wagner, P., Dorsch, R., Hals, S. and Popp, M.Landw. Versuchs-Stat. (1907), 66, 285–372.Google Scholar
(28)Warington, R.J. Chem. Soc. (1888), 53, 732–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar