Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:09:34.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A comparison of spring barley grown in England and in Scotland. 1. Shoot apex development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

E. J. M. Kirby  and
R. P. Ellis
E. J. M. Kirby
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge CB2 2LQ
R. P. Ellis
Affiliation:
Scottish Plant Breeding Station, Pentlandfield, Roslin, Midlothian EH25 9RF
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An analysis of development of Golden Promise and Maris Mink spring barley grown in England and in Scotland was made in 1976 and 1977. In both seasons the differences between varieties at a site were small. Rates of leaf emergence and primordium production and the number of primordia formed and the number which died were almost the same at both sites in 1976. In 1977 both leaf emergence and ear initiation started later in Scotland and the rates of leaf emergence and spikelet initiation were slower. Fewer spikelet primordia were formed in Scotland than in England in 1977 but a higher proportion survived to produce potentially fertile florets. Tillers emerged at the same leaf stage of the main shoot and the frequency of tillering differed at some tiller positions between England and Scotland, but the number of tillers produced was similar at both sites.

These results show that in Scotland the effect of longer photoperiod which enhances the rate of leaf emergence and primordium production compensates for the lower temperature which slows down these processes. The lower temperature in Scotland particularly in 1977 during the period of spikelet primordium death increased the proportion of spikelets that survived.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 95 , Issue 1 , August 1980 , pp. 101 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. L. (1972). Barley production in Scotland. East of Scotland College of Agriculture Bulletin no. 3.Google Scholar
Anon. (1969). Tables for the evaluation of daily values of accumulated temperature. Bracknell: Meteorological Office.Google Scholar
Anon. (1976). The Scottish Agricultural Colleges recommended varieties of cereals 1977. Publication no. 20.Google Scholar
Aspinall, D. (1966). Effects of daylength and light intensity on growth of barley. IV. Genetically controlled variation in response to photoperiod. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 19, 517–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biscoe, P. V., Scott, R. K. & Monteith, J. L. (1975). Barley and its environment. III. Carbon budget of the stand. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department or Agriculture and Fisheries for Scotland (1978). Agricultural Statistics 1977 Scotland. Edinburgh: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Fairey, D. T., Hunt, L. A. & Stoskopf, N. C. (1975). Day-length influence on reproductive developmentand tillering in ‘Fergus’ barley. Canadian Journal of Botany 53, 2770–2775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. (1976). The growth of cereals in relation to weather. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1976). Barley and its environment. VI. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 563–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1977). The growth of the shoot apex and apical dome of barley during ear initiation. Annals of Botany 41, 1297–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Eisenberg, B. E. (1966). Some effects of photoperiod on barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 17, 204–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Faris, D. G. (1970). Some plant population induced growth correlations in the barley plant main shoot and possible hormonal mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Botany 21, 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Riggs, T. J. (1978). Developmental consequences of two-row and six-row ear type spring barley. II. Shoot apex, leaf and tiller development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, D. (1971). Effects of the environment on morphogenesis of the shoot apex of wheat. Ph.D. thesis, University of Adelaide.Google Scholar
Tyldesley, J. B. (1978). A method of evaluating the effect of temperature on an organism when the response is non-linear. Agricultural Meteorology 19, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehouse, R. N. H. (1977). Cereal breeding and its future trends. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed