Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:26:04.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of meal and pellets for growing pigs fed either in troughs or off the floor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. Braude  and
J. G. Rowell
R. Braude
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, Shinfield, Reading
J. G. Rowell
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Statistics Group, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A co-ordinated trial has been carried out with fattening pigs at nineteen centres to compare the effects of the following methods of preparing and presenting the feed: (1) meal fed in the trough; (2) cubes fed in the trough; (3) meal fed off the floor; (4) cubes fed off the floor.

Pigs fed meal off the floor had substantially worse growth rate and feed conversion than pigs on any of the other three treatments, probably because of feed wastage. With trough feeding, pigs fed cubes had slightly better growth rate and feed conversion than pigs fed meal. When the feed was given as cubes, there was little to choose between trough feeding and feeding off the floor. Faster growing pigs were slightly fatter and had slightly smaller eye muscles.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 67 , Issue 1 , August 1966 , pp. 53 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barber, K. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1963). Pig Fmg, 11, 53.Google Scholar
Barber, R. S., Braude, R. & Mitchell, K. G. (1965). Pig Fmg, 13, 76.Google Scholar
Buck, S. F., Habrington, G. & Johnson, R. F. (1962). Anim. Prod. 4, 25.Google Scholar
Calet, C. (1965). World's Poult. Sci. J. 21, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, C. D. T. (1960). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 126.Google Scholar
Gorrill, A. D. L., Bell, J. M. & Williams, C. M. (1960). Canad. J. Anim. Sci. 40, 83, 93, 100.Google Scholar
Kalina, J. (1964). Zemed. Tech. 10, 271.Google Scholar
Koch, B. A. (1963). Kansas State Univ. 50th Ann. Livestk Feeders’ Day Bull. no. 460, 52.Google Scholar
Laird, R. Jr & Robertson, J. B. (1963). Anim. Prod. 5, 97.Google Scholar
Larsen, L. M. & Oldfield, J. E. (1960). J. Anim. Sci. 19, 601.Google Scholar
Seerley, R. W., Miller, E. R. & Hoefer, J. A. (1962). J. Anim. Sci. 21, 829.Google Scholar