Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T00:56:51.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparison of fresh and dried Digitaria decumbens grass intake and digestion by Black-belly rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1999

H. ARCHIMÈDE
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
C. PONCET
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Station de Recherches sur la Nutrition des Herbivores, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand-Theix, Theix, 63122 Saint-Genes-Champanelle, France
M. BOVAL
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
F. NIPEAU
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
L. PHILIBERT
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
A. XANDÉ
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies
G. AUMONT
Affiliation:
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, INRA, Unité de Recherches Zootechniques, Prise d'eau, 97170 Petit-bourg, Guadeloupe, French West Indies

Abstract

The intake and digestion of fresh and dried Digitaria decumbens grass by rams was compared using a 2×2 factorial design. The experiment took place in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) in 1996. Eight rams (mean liveweight: 45·7±3·1 kg) were maintained in metabolism cages. Digitaria decumbens grass was cut daily and distributed to four of them, the other four were fed the following day with the equivalent forage which had meanwhile been dried for 20 h at 60°C. Chemical composition (g/kg of dry matter (DM)) of the two diets based on neutral detergent fibre (NDF, 713, S.E. 18), acid detergent fibre (ADF, 361, S.E. 13) and crude protein (CP, 90, S.E. 4) was similar. The DM intake (61·0 and 53·2 g/W0·75, S.E. 2·0, P<0·05), the NDF (0·753 and 0·727, S.E. 0·004, P<0·011) and CP (0·588 and 0·544, S.E. 0·014, P<0·09) total tract digestibility of fresh and dried herbage were different. Nylon bag estimates of effective DM degradability and fractional degradation rates (per h) in the rumen were 0·436, 0·414 (S.E. 0·005, P<0·004) and 0·048, 0·038 (S.E. 0·002, P<0·02) for fresh and dried grass, respectively. Rumen digestibility of organic matter and NDF were 0·516, 0·541 (S.E. 0·021) and 0·763, 0·692 (S.E. 0·019), respectively. The rumen turnover rates of particles (per h) were 0·024 and 0·015 (S.E. 0·001, P<0·05) for fresh and dried forage respectively. The efficiency of microbial protein synthesis (g microbial nitrogen/kg organic matter apparently degraded in the rumen) was similar with the two diets : 33·5 and 33·0 (S.E. 3·3, P<0·9) for fresh and dried forage respectively. In conclusion, fresh Digitaria decumbens was nutritionally superior to dried. This is probably due to a faster degradation rate and a lower rumen retention time of the fresh forage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)