Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T10:16:41.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of early, normal and late sowing at three rates of nitrogen on the yield, grain nitrogen and screenings content of Blenheim spring malting barley in Ireland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. J. Conry
M. J. Conry
Affiliation:
Oak Park Research Centre, Carlow, Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Nine experiments were carried out on three different soil types in the south-east of Ireland over three years (1989, 1992 and 1993) to test the effect of early, normal and late sowing at three rates of fertilizer nitrogen (100, 125, 150 kg/ha) on the yield and grain quality ex-farm of spring malting barley (cv. Blenheim). Early sowing (January or February) was not possible in 1990 and 1991 due to wet weather. Sowing date had a pronounced effect on grain yield and grain N content in all three years. In 1989 and 1992, the earliest-sown barley (January or February) gave significantly greater yields than latersown crops (March and April) in five of the six experiments. The earliest-sown barley gave the lowest grain N in all six experiments and there was a gradual and significant increase in grain N content as sowing date was delayed. In 1993 the earliest-sown barley (February) gave significantly lower yield and greater grain N than the March-sown crop in all three experiments. The lower yield of the February-sown barley in 1993 was due to the significantly reduced number of grains/ear. The Aprilsown barley gave significantly lower yield and greater grain N than the earlier-sown crops in eight out of the nine experiments. In 1989 and 1992 only one of the six experiments, Ferns 1992, gave a significant yield response to increased rate of N (125 kg/ha). But in 1993, 125 kg N/ha significantly increased grain yield in all three experiments and 150 kg N/ha gave a further significant increase in yield in two of the experiments. Increasing increments of fertilizer N significantly increased grain N in all nine experiments.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 125 , Issue 2 , October 1995 , pp. 183 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blackett, G. A. & Taylor, B. R. (1982). An evaluation of inputs to maximise the yield of Midas spring barley in the north of Scotland. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 16, 7–14.Google Scholar
Bulman, P. & Smith, D. L. (1993). Yield and yield component response of spring barley to fertilizer nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 85, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conry, M. J. & Keane, T. (1994). Effect of adverse climatic factors on the grain yield and protein content of malting barley sown in early spring in 1993. In Proceedings of the Third Congress of the European Society of Agronomy (Eds Borin, M. & Sattin, M.), pp. 592–593. Abano-Padova: Padova University.Google Scholar
Cranstown, D. A. S. (1992). Nitrogen requirement for malting spring barley. Aspects of Applied Biology 30, Nitrate and farming systems, 409–412.Google Scholar
Easson, D. L. & Saunders, A. R. (1986). A comparison of the effects of sowing date, nitrogen application, herbicide, fungicide, growth regulator and other treatments on the yield of spring barley. Record of Agricultural Research, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland 34, 29–38.Google Scholar
Froment, M. A., McDonald, H. G. & Withers, P. J. A. (1993). Grain yield and quality in spring barley: effect of sowing date and nitrogen rate. Aspects of Applied Biology 36, Cereal quality III, 355–360.Google Scholar
Garstang, J. R. & Giltrap, N. J. (1990). The effect of applied and soil mineral nitrogen on the yield and quality of malting barley varieties. Aspects of Applied Biology 25, Cereal quality II, 315–327.Google Scholar
Gately, T. F. (1968). The effects of different levels of N, P and K on the yields, nitrogen content and kernel weights of malting barley (var. Proctor). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 70, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, C. A., Gauer, L. E., Gehl, D. T. & Bailey, L. D. (1991). Yield response of semidwarf and conventional height barley cultivars to nitrogen fertilizer under varying moisture conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, F. J., Bartholomew, P. W. & Murdock, J. C. (1975). Effect of sowing date, seed rate, nitrogen application rate and method of sowing on grain yields of barley in Northern Ireland. Record of Agricultural Research, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland 23, 1–4.Google Scholar
Kopecky, M. (1985). The effect of forecrop, sowing rate and nitrogen rate and time of application on the yield and quality of spring barley in the beet-growing region. Rostlinná Výroba 10, 1009–1022.Google Scholar
Martin, R. J. & Daly, M. J. (1993). Management of Triumph barley for high quality on light soils in Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 21, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, I. A. & Ann, D. M. (1979). The effect of time of sowing and ethirimol seed treatment on mildew and yield of three varieties of spring barley. Experimental Husbandry 35, 62–67.Google Scholar
Patel, J. C. (1990). Effects of date of sowing on contrasting barley varieties. Dissertation Abstracts International, B, Sciences and Engineering 50, 4286B.Google Scholar
Withers, P. J. A. & Dyer, C. (1990). The effect of applied nitrogen on the acceptability of spring barley for malting. Aspects of Applied Biology 25, Cereal quality II, 329–337.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar