Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:18:00.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals

2. Spring barley on a sandy loam soil: soil physical conditions and root growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. B. Ellis ,
J. G. Elliott ,
B. T. Barnes  and
K. R. Howse
F. B. Ellis
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, 0X12 9JT
J. G. Elliott
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Weed Research Organization, Begbroke Hill, Oxford 0X5 1PF
B. T. Barnes
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, 0X12 9JT
K. R. Howse
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory, Wantage, 0X12 9JT
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This paper gives measurements of soil physical conditions and root growth made in the experiment described in the previous paper. The effect of methods of tillage on soil properties (strength, bulk density, nutrient distribution and fauna) and the effects on root development and the absorption of nutrients from different depths in the soil were investigated. The procedures used for these measurements are described.

Greater soil compaction occurred in all years after direct drilling. The growth of seminal roots of young plants was reduced by direct drilling in each year but only in the first year were there significant differences in root development between treatments at later stages of growth. Similarly, in each year early shoot growth was reduced by direct drilling but, with the exception of the first year, the plants were subsequently able to compensate adequately. Direct drilling resulted in more earthworms being present in the soil, and caused the surface soil to be more friable and contain a higher concentration of available phosphorus and potassium.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 3 , December 1977 , pp. 631 - 643
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakermans, W. A. P. & de Wit, C. T. (1970). Crop husbandry on naturally compacted soils. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 18, 225–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. T. & Sanderson, J. (1971). Relationship between the anatomy of cereal roots and the absorption of nutrients and water. Agricultural Research Council Letcombe Laboratory Annual Report 1970, 16–25.Google Scholar
Elliott, J. G., Ellis, F. B. & Pollard, F. (1977). Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals. 1. Spring barley on a sandy loam soil: introduction, aerial growth and agronomic aspects. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 621–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, F. B. & Barnes, B. T. (1973). Estimation of the distribution of living roots of plants under field conditions. Plant and Soil 39, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, A. C. & Guild, W. J. McL. (1947). Studies on the relationships between earthworms and soil fertility. I. Biological studies in the field. Annals of Applied Biology 34, 307–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, B. M. (1964). A synopsis of the British Lumbricidae Linneal Society, London.Google Scholar
Large, E. C. (1954) Growth stages in cereals: Illustration of the Feekes Scale. Plant Pathology 3, 127–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lay, P. M. (1973). Automatic sample changer for large samples. Laboratory Practice 22, 728–30.Google Scholar
Merwin, H. D. & Peach, M. (1950). Exchangeability of soil potassium in the sand, silt and clay fractions as influenced by the nature of the complementary exchangeable cation. Proceedings of the Soil Science Society of America 15, 125–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metson, A. J. (1956). Methods of chemical analysis for soil survey samples. New Zealand Soil Bureau Bulletin 12.Google Scholar
Newbould, P., Taylor, R. & Howse, K. R. (1971). The absorption of phosphate and calcium from different depths in soil by swards of perennial ryegrass. Journal of the British Grassland Society 26, 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. V., Watanabe, F. S. & Dean, L. A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S.D.A. Circular No. 939, 1–19.Google Scholar
Raw, F. (1959). Estimating earthworm populations using formalin. Nature, London 184, 1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, R. S. & Ellis, F. B. (1968). Estimation of the distribution of plant roots in soil. Nature, London 27, 582–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwerdtle, F. (1969). Investigations on the population density of earthworms in relation to conventional tillage and direct drilling. Zeitschrift für Phlanzenkrankheiten (Phlanzenpathologie) und Pflanzenschutz 76, 635–41.Google Scholar
Soane, B. D., Campbell, D. J. & Herkes, S. M. (1971). The use of a simple penetrometer in field tillage studies. British Society for Research in Agriculture Engineering. NIAE Scottish Station Departmental Note 67.Google Scholar
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method. Soil Science 37, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodruff, C. M. (1948). Testing soils for lime requirements by means of a buffered solution and the glass electrode. Soil Science 66, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar