Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:50:59.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative energy and protein utilization in kids and lambs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. R. Alam ,
D. P. Poppi  and
A. R. Sykes
M. R. Alam
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
D. P. Poppi
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
A. R. Sykes
Affiliation:
Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Twenty-eight male castrate kids and 28 male castrate lambs were assigned to a comparative slaughter experiment to compare energy and protein utilization. The experiment was conducted from January to March at Lincoln, New Zealand. Ten animals of each species comprised the initial slaughter group while the remaining 18 animals were randomly allocated to five feeding regimes. Animals were offered high-quality meadow hay for 13 weeks and then slaughtered. The energy retained in the body was regressed against metabolizable energy intake (MEI) to obtain estimates of maintenance energy requirement (MEm) and efficiency of energy utilization for growth (kg).

Kids tended to have a higher MEm (0·44 v. 0·37 MJ ME/kg W0·75 per day in kids and lambs, respectively) and a higher kg (0·28v. 0·22) though these differences were not significant. There was no difference between the species in the composition of gain of the fleece or hair-free body with a protein energy to gross energy ratio in the gain of 0·20. The fleece or hair-free body composition was similar for both species (initial 0·51v. 0·48; final 0·36 v. 0·32; protein energy:gross energy, kids and lambs, respectively). Overall, the values for kg in both species were low and could not be explained solely by the composition of the gain.

The efficiency of use of apparently absorbed amino acid (AA) for fleece or hair-free body protein deposition was higher for kids (0·52 v. 0·29) and, when the fleece or hair was included, the value increased markedly for lambs (0·50 v. 0·41, kids v. lambs, respectively). The protein energy apparently absorbed in the small intestine/MEI was not high or different between species (mean 0·18). The efficiency values for both species are low and not explained by the supply of protein relative to energy, which was not high.

It was concluded that, with high-quality forage used to promote live weight gain, there was little difference between kids and lambs in the utilization of forage energy, and that the efficiency of utilization of absorbed protein for protein deposition was lower than expected in both species.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 117 , Issue 1 , August 1991 , pp. 121 - 127
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock, Suppl. I. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Alam, M. R., Poppi, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1983). Intake, digestibility and retention time of two forages by kids and lambs. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 43, 119–121.Google Scholar
Alam, M. R., Lawson, G. D., Popim, D. P. & Sykes, A. R. (1987). A comparison of the site and extent of digestion of nutrients of a forage in kids and lambs. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 583–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, A. J. & Norton, B. W. (1987a). Studies with the Australian Cashmere Goat. 1. Growth and digestion in male and female goats given pelleted diets varying in protein content and energy level. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 957–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, A. J. & Norton, B. W. (1987b). Studies with the Australian Cashmere Goat. II. Effects of dietary protein concentration and feeding level on body composition of male and female weaner goats. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 971–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1981). Protein metabolism in growing lambs fed on fresh ryegrass (Lolium perenne)—c/over (Trifolium repens) pasature ad libitum. 1. Protein and energy deposition in response to abomasal infusion of casein and methionine. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 521–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beever, D. E., Gill, M., Dawson, J. M. & Buttery, P. J. (1990). The effect of fishmeal on the digestion of grass silage by growing cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 63, 489–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devendra, C. (1967). Studies in the nutrition of the indigenous goat of Malaya. The maintenance requirements of pen-fed goats. The Malaysian Agricultural Journal 46, 80–97.Google Scholar
Fennessy, P. F., Woodlock, M. R. & Jagusch, K. T. (1972). Energy balance studies with weaned lambs. II. Effect of age at weaning on the utilization of metabolizable energy of lucerne and ryegrass–clover pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M.. & Thornley, J. H. M., Black, J. L., Oldham, J. D. & Beever, D. E. (1984). Simulation of the metabolism of absorbed energy-yielding nutrients in young sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. (1980). Variation in energy and nitrogen utilization by sheep between weaning and maturity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 31, 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, C. W. & Moore, Y. F. (1981). Metabolizablc energy required by feral goats for maintenance and the effects of cold climatic conditions on their heat production. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 41, 163–166.Google Scholar
Itoh, M., Haryu, T., Tano, R., & Iwasaki, K. (1979). Maintenance requirements of energy and protein for castrated Japanese native goats. Bulletin of the National Institute of Animal Industry (Japan) 33, 41—50.Google Scholar
Jagusch, K.T. & Mitchell, R. M. (1971). Utilization of the metabolizable energy of ewe's milk by lambs. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 434–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagusch, K. T., Duganzich, D. M., Kidd, G. T. & Church, S. M. (1983). Efficiency of goat milk utilization by milk-fed kids. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 433–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, J. P., Brunswick, L. & Parker, J. (1972). Feeding value of lucerne. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 32, 54–63.Google Scholar
Lobley, G. E. (1986). The physiological bases of nutrient responses: growth and fattening. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 45, 203–214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macrae, J. C. & Lobley, G. E. (1982). Some factors which influence thermal energy losses during the metabolism of ruminants. Livestock Production Science 9, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrae, J. C., Smith, J. D., Dewey, P. J. S., Brewer, A. C., Brown, D. S. & Walker, A. (1985). The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy and apparent absorption of amino acids in sheep given spring and autumn harvested dried grass. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell, R. M. & Jagusch, K. T. (1972). Energy balance studies with weaned lambs. I. Utilization of metabolizable energy of lucerne by lambs weaned at five weeks of age. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 15, 788–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohammed, H. H. & Owen, E. (1980). Comparison of the maintenance requirement of sheep and goats. Animal Production 30. 479P.Google Scholar
Mohammed, H. H. & Owen, E. (1982). Goats versus sheep: effect of coat thickness and body composition on maintenance energy requirement. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goal Production and Disease, p. 560. Tucson, Arizona: Dairy Goat Publishing Co.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1981). Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals. Nutrient Requirements of Goats. Washington: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rajpoot, R. L.. & Sengar, O. P. S. & Singh, S. N. (1982). Energy requirements of Indian goats for growth, maintenance, pregnancy and lactation. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goal Production and Disease, p. 559. Tucson, Arizona: Dairy Goat Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Rattray, P. V. & Joyce, J. P. (1974). Nutritive value of white clover and perennial ryegrass. IV. Utilization of dietary energy. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., Hinman, N., Garcia, I. & Castillo, J. (1973a). A system for expressing the net energy requirements and net energy content of feeds for young sheep. Journal of Animal Science 36, 115–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., East, N. E. & Hinman, N. (1973b). Net energy requirements of ewe lambs for maintenance, gain and pregnancy and net energy values of feedstuffs for lambs. Journal of Animal Science 37, 853–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Garrett, W. N., Meyer, H. H., Bradford, G. E., Hinman, N. & East, N. E. (1973C). Net energy requirements for growth of lambs aged three to five months. Journal of Animal Science 37, 1386–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidahmed, A. E., Morris, J. G. & Koong, L. J. (1981). Contribution of mixtures of three chaparral shrubs to the protein and energy requirements of Spanish goats. Journal of Animal Science 53, 1391–1400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, A. R. & Nicol, A. M. (1984). The energy requirement of the weaned lamb. In Lamb Growth (Ed. Familton, A. S.), pp. 121–134. Lincoln: Lincoln College Press.Google Scholar
Sykes, A. R., Poppi, D. P. & Elliott, D. C. (1988). Effect of concurrent infection with Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis on the performance of growing lambs consuming fresh herbage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theriez, M., Tissier, M. & Brun, J. P. (1979). Effects of metabolizable energy content of diet and feeding level on the efficiency of energy utilization by growing lambs. In Energy Metabolism, Proceedings of the Eight Symposium on Energy Metabolism (Ed. Mount, L. E.), pp. 69–72. European Association for Animal Production, publication no. 26.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. & Cammell, S. B. (1971). The utilization or chopped and pelleted lucerne by growing lambs. Proceedings of lite Nutrition Society 30, 88A.Google ScholarPubMed
Thomson, D. J. & Cammell, S. B. (1979). The utilization of chopped and pelleted lucerne (McDicago saliva) by growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Fenlon, J. S. & Cammell, S. B. (1979). Estimates of maintenance requirement of growing lambs. British Journal of Nutrition 41, 223–229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, D. M. & Jagusch, K. T. (1969). Utilization of metabolizable energy of cow's milk by the lamb. In Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium (Eds Blaxter, K. L., Kielanowski, J. & Thorbek, G.), pp. 187–195. European Association for Animal Production, publication no. 12.Google Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Norton, B. W. (1971). The utilization of the metabolizable energy of diets of different protein content by the milk-fed lamb. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar