Article contents
The breeding season of the sheep with particular reference to its modification by artificial means using light
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 March 2009
Extract
At the beginning of the present century Heape (1900), describing the sexual season of mammals, pointed out that sheep in the British Isles are sexually active during only a portion of the year.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1949
References
REFERENCES
Berliner, V. & Warbritton, V. (1937). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 30th Ann. Meeting, p. 137.Google Scholar
Brady, D. E. & Gildow, E. M. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 32nd Ann. Meeting, p. 250.Google Scholar
Briggs, H. M., Darlow, A. E., Hawkins, L. E., Willham, O. S. & Hauser, E. R. (1942). Bull. Okla. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 255.Google Scholar
Callenbach, E. W., Nicholas, J. E. & Murphy, R. R. (1943). Bull. Pa Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 455.Google Scholar
Chang, M. C. (1941). A Study of the Physiology of Ram Spermatozoa. University of Cambridge Thesis for Ph.D. Degree.Google Scholar
Clark, W. E., Le, Gros, Mckeown, T. & Zuckerman, S. (1938). Proc. Roy. Soc. B, 126, 449.Google Scholar
Darlow, A. E. & Hawkins, L. E. (1932). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 25th Ann. Meeting, p. 173.Google Scholar
Dobie, J. B., Carver, J. S. & Roberts, J. (1946). Bull. Wash. St. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 471.Google Scholar
Friedgood, H. B. (1946). Endocrine Function of the Hypophysis. Oxford Univ. Press, N.Y.Google Scholar
Frölich, G. (1931). Das Karukalschaf und seine Zacht. 2nd ed. Munich: F. C. Mayer. (A.B.A. 1, 58.)Google Scholar
Gunn, R. M. C., Sanders, R. N. & Granger, W. (1942). Bull. Coun. Sci. Industr. Res. Aust. no. 148.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jr, (1944 b). Br. Soc. Anim. Prod., Rep. of Proc. 2nd Meeting, 25 October 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane-Roberts, C., Sharman, A., Walker, A. & Wiesner, B. P. (1939). Sterility and Impaired Fertility. Hamish Hamilton Medical Books, London.Google Scholar
Larionov, W. T. (1941). C.R. (Dokl.) Acad. Sci., U.R.S.S., N.S., 30, 374. (A.B.A. 11, 125.)Google Scholar
Litovcenko, I. R. & Litovcenko, E. I. (1938). Usp. Zooteh. Nauk. 5 (2), 86. (A.B.A. 7, 226.)Google Scholar
Marshall, F. H. A. & Hammond, J. (1945). Bull. Minist. Agric., Lond., no. 39. (H.M. Stationery Office.)Google Scholar
Mauch, A., Mihaila, S. & Hoblea, D. (1937). Bui. Asoc. Med. vet. Român. 49, 482. (A.B.A. 7, 321.)Google Scholar
Milby, T. T. & Thompson, R. B. (1942). Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 22, 41. (A.B.A. 12, 43.)Google Scholar
Miller, R. F., Hart, G. H. & Cole, H. H. (1942). Bull. Univ. Calif. Exp. Sta. no. 672.Google Scholar
Nautical Almanac (1945). H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Nicholas, J. E., Callenbach, E. W. & Murphy, R. R. (1944). Bull. Pa. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 462.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. E., Shier, F. L. & Roberts, R. P. (1938). J. Dep. Agric., W. Aust. (2nd ed.), 15, 474.Google Scholar
Pomanskii, E. A. & Stojanovskaja, V. I. (1936). Probl. Zivotn. no. 3, 77. (A.B.A. 4, 435.)Google Scholar
Radulescu, A. (1933). Inst. Nat. Zootech., Bucharest (Ann. Rept. for 1932). (A.B.A. 2, 80.)Google Scholar
Schott, R. G., Phillips, R. W. & Spencer, D. A. (1939). Proc. Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 32nd Ann. Meeting, p. 347.Google Scholar
Underwood, E. J., Shier, F. L. & Davenport, N. (1944). J. Dep. Agric. W. Aust. 21, 135.Google Scholar
Usakova, S. A. & Fudelj, T. N. (1941). Trud. jaroslavsk. oblast. opyt. Stanc. Zivotn. p. 93. (A.B.A. 14, 236.)Google Scholar
Walton, A. (1945). Notes on the Technique of Artificial Insemination. Holborn Surgical Inst. Co., London.Google Scholar
- 216
- Cited by