Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T22:57:24.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body weight and wool production in grazing sheep given access to a supplement of urea and molasses: intake of supplement/response relationships

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. V. Nolan ,
B. W. Norton ,
R. M. Murray ,
F. M. Ball ,
F. B. Roseby ,
W. Rohan-Jones ,
M. K. Hill  and
R. A. Leng
J. V. Nolan
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
B. W. Norton
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
R. M. Murray
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
F. M. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
F. B. Roseby
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
W. Rohan-Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
M. K. Hill
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
R. A. Leng
Affiliation:
Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2351
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A technique for estimating the intake of liquid supplements by individual, grazing animals was used in a trial with 200 sheep grazing poor quality pasture and given access to a urea-molasses supplement (19%, w/v).

A mathematical procedure was developed to estimate intake of supplement based on measurements of the accumulation of tritiated water (TOH) and its rate of turnover in the body of each animal after a TOH-labelled mixture had been available for a period of 7 days.

In calculating the level of intake of labelled supplement, it was assumed that each animal ingested the mixture once daily over the 7-day period, since animals were observed to take the supplement daily and the daily loss of supplement from the dispenser was noarly constant. It was estimated that the combined intakes of the animals accounted for 87% of the known total loss of labelled supplement from the dispenser.

Of the 200 sheep, 97 did not consume any supplement and among the other 103 animals, estimated intake varied from 5 to 550 ml/day.

All sheep lost body weight during the trial, but those consuming the supplement lost significantly less weight, and grew significantly more wool during the period of supplementation, than did the sheep that did not consume the supplement.

A small but significant amount of the variance (13%) in body-weight change and wool growth during supplementation was removed by multiple regression analysis, by including the intake of the supplement, faecal egg count (as an indication of parasite burden) and body weight at the start of the trial, as independent variables. Other factors not studied (e.g., dry matter intake) apparently accounted for a large proportion of the variance.

The relationship between body-weight change and intake of the urea-molasses mixture was compatible with the hypothesis that the supplement was used largely as a concentrate feed, and not solely as a nitrogen supplement.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 84 , Issue 1 , February 1975 , pp. 39 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2, Ruminants. London: Agricultural Research Council.Google Scholar
Alexander, G. I. (1971). The use of NPN Supplements for Grazing Cattle and Sheep in Australia. In Report of an Ad hoc Consultation on the Values of Non-Protein Nitrogen for Ruminants Consuming Poor Herbages. Kampala, Uganda, 29 06 1971, FAO Publication.Google Scholar
Bray, G. A. (1960). A simple efficient liquid scintillator for counting aqueous solutions in a liquid scintillation counter. Analytical Biochemistry 1, 279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, D. J. & Reardon, T. F. (1972). Undernutrition in grazing sheep. III. Body composition and its estimation in vivo. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendler, R. W. (1964). Procedure for simultaneous assay of two β-emitting isotopes with the liquid scintillation counting technique. Analytical Biochemistry 7, 110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hogan, J. P. & Weston, R. H. (1970). In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, ed. Phillipson, A. T., p. 474. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, D. M., McManus, W. R. & Freer, M. (1969). Changes in the body composition and efficiency of mature sheep during loss and regain of live weight. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, J. P. & Holmes, C. R. (1974). The consumption of antifoaming detergents administered in drinking water and roller drums to grazing beef cattle. Australian Journal Agricultural Research (in the press).Google Scholar
Loosli, J. K. & McDonald, I. W. (1968). Non-protein nitrogen in the nutrition of ruminants. FAO Agricultural Studies, No. 76.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, W. V., Howard, B. & Siebert, B. D. (1969). Tritiated water in the measurement of milk intake and tissue growth of ruminants in the field. Nature, London 221, 578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marsh, W. H., Fingerhut, B. & Miller, H. (1965). Automated and manual methods for the determination of blood urea. Clinical Chemistry 11, 624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mutch, C. B. (1966). Handy urea-molasses lick feeder. Queensland Agricultural Journal 92, 630.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Ball, F. M., Murray, R. M., Norton, B. W. & Leng, R. N. (1974). Evaluation of a urea-molasses supplement for grazing cattle. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 10, 91.Google Scholar
Nolan, J. V., Cocimano, M. R. & Leng, R. A. (1970). Predictions of parameters of urea metabolism in sheep from the concentration of urea in plasma. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 8, 22.Google Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. (1963). Body composition in vivo. III. The composition of living ruminants and its relation to the tritiated water spaces. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 14, 944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panaretto, B. A. (1968). The relation of body composition to the tritiated water spaces of ewes and wethers fasted for short periods. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, B. E. & Boling, E. A. (1961). Rapid assay procedures for tritium-labelled water in body fluids. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine 57, 159.Google Scholar
Walker, D. J. (1965). Energy metabolism and rumen micro-organisms. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, ed. Dougherty, R. W., p. 296. Washington: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Whitlock, H. V. (1948). Some modifications of the McMaster helminth egg-counting technique and apparatus. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Australia 21, 177.Google Scholar
Winks, L. & Laing, A. R. (1972). Urea, phosphorus and molasses supplements for grazing beef weaners. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 253.Google Scholar
Winks, L., Laing, A. R. & Stokoe, J. (1972). Level of urea for grazing yearling cattle during the dry season in tropical Queensland. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 9, 258.Google Scholar