Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T20:15:34.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Animal production from naturalized and sown pastures at three stocking rates under coconuts in the Solomon Islands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. E. Watson  and
P. C. Whiteman
S. E. Watson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
P. C. Whiteman
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia 4067
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A grazing study, comparing a naturalized and a sown pasture at three stocking rates, was conducted under a uniform stand of 65-year-old coconuts on a fertile soil in the Russell Islands. In a plot trial on this site there was no significant response to application of up to 400 kg N/ha/year over 2 years to Brachiaria decumbens. Average daily transmission of photosynthetically active radiation through the coconut canopy was 60% of full sunlight. The sown pasture consisted initially of para (Brachiaria mutica), signal (B. decumbens) and koronivia (B. humidicola) with the legumes Centrosema pubescens, Pueraria phaseoloides and Stylosanthes guianensis. The main species in the naturalized pasture were Axonopus compressus, Mimosa pudica, C. pubescens and Colopogonium mucunoides. Pastures were set stocked in two replicates over 3 years at 1·5, 2·5 and 3·5 animals/ha. There was no significant difference in live-weight gain between pastures in any year. Live-weight gain per head declined linearly with increasing stocking rate. Highest live-weight gain was 437 kg/ha/year in the 1st year at 3·5 animals/ha. The planted grasses declined from 60% at the start of grazing to 6% 8 months later. A. compressus increased from 2 to 24% over 3 years in the sown pasture, and from 12 to 34% of yield in the natural pasture. M. pudica increased from 27 to 44% in the sown, and remained approximately constant at 37% in the natural pasture. G. pubescens increased at 2·5 animals/ha, but was replaced by P. phaseoloides at 1·5 animals/ha and by A. compressus and M. pudica at 3·5 animals/ha. There were no significant effects of pasture treatments or stocking rate on copra yields. Where there is a cover of naturalized grasses and legumes under coconuts, cultivation and planting of exotic species cannot be recommended. Major improvement will come from thorough weed control and maintaining stocking rates between 1·5 and 2·5 animals/ha.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 669 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

, Anon. (1971). Catch cropping and intercropping reports. 11th Report, Research Dept of C.I.B., pp. 44–48, Jamaica, W. Indies.Google Scholar
, Anon. (1976). Elevage sous palmeraie. Le Journal de Planteur 17, 2–3.Google Scholar
Ash, P. G., Wall, J. R. D. & Hansell, J. R. F. (1974). Rainfall data for the British Solomon Islands Protectorate to 1973. Makira, Yandina. Land Resources Study, Land Resources Division, U.K. Ministry of Overseas Development. Supplementary Report No. 12.Google Scholar
Beetle, A. A. (1973). Sour paspalum – tropical weed or forage. Journal of Range Management 27, 347–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boonklinkajorn, P. (1978). Herbage production of grasses under coconuts in southern Thailand. Seminar on Integration of Animals with Plantation Crops. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 04 1978.Google Scholar
Chen, C. P., Chang, K. P., Sidhu, A. S. & Wahab, H. (1978). Pasture and animal production under 5 year old oil palm at Serdang. Seminar on Integration of Animals with Plantation Crops. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 04 1978.Google Scholar
de Silva, M. A. T. (1961). Cover crops under coconuts. Ceylon Coconut Planters Review 11, 17–24,Google Scholar
Eriksen, R. & Whitney, A. S. (1977). Performance of tropical forage grasses and legumes under different light intensities. Proceedings of Regional Seminar on Pasture Research, pp. 180–190, Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara, Solomon Islands.Google Scholar
Ferdinandez, D. E. F. (1970). Report of the agrostologist – 1969. Ceylon Coconut Quarterly 21, 49–53.Google Scholar
Ferdinandez, D. E. F. (1972). Effect of monospecific pasture swards on the nut yields of coconuts. Ceylon Coconut Quarterly 23, 51–53.Google Scholar
Freeman, I. B. (1977). Some aspects of the history and future development of the cattle industry of the Solomon Islands. Proceedings of Regional Seminar on Pasture Research, pp. 1–9. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara, Solomon Islands.Google Scholar
Green, A. M. & Foale, M. A. (1961). The improvement of the coconut palm production of the high islands of the tropical Pacific. Symposium on Tropical Crop Improvement. 10th Pacific Science Congress, pp. 65–69, S.P.C., Noumea.Google Scholar
Gutteridge, R. C. & Whiteman, P. C. (1978). Pasture species evaluation in the Solomon Islands. Tropical Grasslands 11, 113–126.Google Scholar
Hansell, J. R. F., Wall, J. R. D., Webb, I. S. & Ash, P. G. (1975). Soil descriptions and analyses from New Georgia and the Russell Islands, Solomon Islands. Land Resources Study, Land Resources Division, U.K. Ministry of Overseas Development. Supplementary Report No. 19.Google Scholar
Hill, G. D. (1969). Grazing under coconuts in the Morobe District. Papua New Guinea Agricultural Journal 21, 10–12.Google Scholar
Kasasian, L. (1971). Weed Control in the Tropics, pp. 189–195. London: Leonard Hill.Google Scholar
Ludlow, M. M., Wilson, G. L. & Heslehurst, M. R. (1974). Studies on the productivity of tropical pasture plants. Effects of shading on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in two grasses and two legumes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 25, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nitis, I. M. & Rika, K. (1978). Bali cattle grazing improved pasture under coconuts. I. Effect of stocking rate on steer performance and coconut yield. Seminar on Integration of Animals with Plantation Crops. Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 04 1978.Google Scholar
Plucknett, D. L. (1972). Management of natural and established pastures for cattle production under coconuts. Proceedings of the Regional Seminar on Pastures and Cattle under Coconuts, pp. 109–127. South Pacific Commission, Noumea, New Caledonia.Google Scholar
Ranacou, B. (1972). Pasture species under coconuts. Proceedings of the Regional Seminar on Pastures and Cattle under Coconuts, pp. 95–99. Alafua, Western Samoa.Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. G. (1977). Pasture research and development in Western Samoa. Proceedings of the Regional Seminar on Pasture Research, pp. 86–100. Ministry of Agriculture and Lands, Honiara, Solomon Islands.Google Scholar
Santhirasegaram, K. & Febdinandez, D. E. F. (1967). Yield and competitive relationship between two species of Brachiaria in association. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 44, 229–234.Google Scholar
Steel, R. J. & Whiteman, P. C. (1980). Pasture species evaluation, pasture fertilizer requirements and weed control in the Solomon Islands. Technical Report, Solomon Islands Pasture Research Project 95 pp. University of Queensland.Google Scholar
Stobbs, T. H. (1977). Seasonal changes in the preference by cattle for Macroptilium atropurpureum cv. Siratro. Tropical Grasslands 11, 87–92.Google Scholar
Walton, J. (1972). Cattle under coconuts. In Cocoa and Coconuts in Malaysia (ed. Wastie, R. L. and Earp, D. A.), pp. 422–425. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Incorporated Society of Planters.Google Scholar
Watson, S. E. & Whiteman, P. C. (1981). Grazing studies on the Guadalcanal Plains, Solomon Islands 2. Effects of pasture mixtures and stocking rate on animal production and pasture components. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 97, 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar