Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-29T14:16:24.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of yield stability in field beans (Vicia faba L.) in the Northern Province of the Sudan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. E. Yassin
T. E. Yassin
Affiliation:
Hudeiba Research Station, A.R.C., P.O. Box 31, Ed-Damer, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Ten varieties of field beans, grown in different environments, were analyzed for genotypic stability of their seed yield. The linear responses to the environments were insignificant, but deviations from linearity were highly significant suggesting that the relatively unpredictable component of the genotype x environments interactions was more important in this material than the relatively predictable component. Environmental effects per se were very important in determining differences in mean seed yield. The relatively large deviations from linearity of variety IW may be due to powdery mildew disease. RB 29 was identified as a good yielding and stable variety in the range of environments tested.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 80 , Issue 1 , February 1973 , pp. 119 - 124
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allard, R. W. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1964). Implications of genotype-environment interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Sci. 4, 503–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, D. A. (1967). Combining ability of winter beans (Vicia faba L.) inbreds. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breese, E. L. (1969). The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 24, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberhart, S. A. & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6, 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, K. W. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14, 742–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, G. H. & Perkins, Jean M. (1971). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. VIII. Relation between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity 27, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fripp, Yvonne J. & Caten, C. E. (1971). Genotype-environmental interactions in Schizophyllum commune. I. Analysis and character. Heredity 27, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heipko, G. H. (1966). Conclusions on work carried out, April, 1961–April, 1966. 1965/66 Annual Report of Hudeiba Research Station, pp. 8 and 9.Google Scholar
Joppa, L. R., Lebsock, K. L. & Busch, R. H. (1971). Yield stability of selected spring wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 11, 238–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, G. H. L., Heyne, E. G. & Walter, T. L. (1966). Estimates of variety x environmental interactions in yield tests of three small Grains and their significance on the breeding programs. Crop Sci. 6, 135–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J. (1970). Fertilizer nitrogen and growth regulators for field beans (Vicia faba L.). II. The effects of large dressing of fertilizer nitrogen, single and split applications and growth regulators. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 74, 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A., Williams, J. C. & Robinson, H. F. (1959). Variety x environment interactions and their implications in cotton variety tests. Agron. J. 51, 132–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paroda, R. S. & Hayes, J. D. (1971). An investigation of genotype – environment interactions for rate of ear emergence in spring barley. Heredity 26, 157–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perkins, Jean M. & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Environmental and genotype – environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23, 339–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. A. & Eberhart, S. A. (1968). Test crosses of one-ear and two-ear types of Corn Belt maize inbreds. II. Stability of performance in different environments. Crop Sci. 8, 248–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shultz, W. M. & Bernard, R. C. (1967). Genotype x environment interactions in regional testings of soybeans. Crop Sci. 7, 127–30.Google Scholar
Tai, George C. C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop Sci. 11, 184–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar