Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-4zrgc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T06:58:37.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small plots and automatic rain shelters: a field appraisal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. J. Legg ,
W. Day ,
N. J. Brown  and
G. J. Smith
B. J. Legg
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
W. Day
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
N. J. Brown
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
G. J. Smith
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two rain shelters, each covering an area of 210 m2, have been built at Rothamsted for use in tillage experiments and drought experiments. Each shelter automatically moves over the experimental area when rain starts, and moves away when rain stops; thus all rain is kept off, but other aspects of the microclimate are little affected. Small experimental plots were used, and, except in the 0·5 m strips at the plot edges, the height and yield of a barley crop were uniform. Irrigation water to some plots was labelled with tritium; when applied to very dry plots, a measurable proportion of this water moved laterally by more than 1·0 m. However, the total quantity of water transferring between adjacent plots was not large enough to inconvenience the tillage or drought experiments.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 91 , Issue 2 , October 1978 , pp. 321 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avery, B. W. (1964). The Soils and Land Use of the District around Aylesbury and Hemel Hempstead. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Blume, H. P., Zimmermann, U. & Münnich, K. O. (1967). Tritium tagging of soil moisture: the water balance of forest soils. In Isotope and Radiation Techniques in Soil Physics and Irrigation Studies, 315–332. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Caborn, J. M. (1957). Shelterbelts and Microclimate. Forestry Commission Bulletin no. 29. Edinburgh: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Dubetz, S., Thurston, E. W. & Bergen, H. J. (1968). Automatic rain shelter for small outdoor plots. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 10, 40–41.Google Scholar
Gbant, D. R. (1970). Some measurements of evaporation in a field of barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 433–443.Google Scholar
Horton, M. L. (1962). ‘Rainout’ shelter for corn. Iowa Farm Science 17 (2), 16.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. R. & Moss, D. N. (1976). Effect of water stress on 14CO2 fixation and translocation in wheat during grain filling. Crop Science 16, 697–701.Google Scholar
Kline, J. R., Stewart, M. L., Jordan, C. F. & Kovac, P. (1972). Use of tritiated water for determination of plant transpiration and biomass under field conditions. In The Use of Isotopes and Radiation Research on Soil-Plant Relationships including Applications in Forestry, pp. 419–437. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
Knight, A. H., Boggie, R. & Shepherd, H. (1972). The effect of ground water level on water movement in peat: a study using tritiated water. Journal of Applied Ecology 9, 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, K. J. & Aslyng, H. C. (1971). Lysimeters with rainfall and soil water control. Nordic Hydrology 2, 79–92.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1964). Evaporation and environment. In The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms, pp. 205–233. The XIXth symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology, Swansea. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1973). Principles of Environmental Physics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Pelton, W. L. (1967). The effect of a windbreak on the wind travel, evaporation and wheat yield. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 47, 209–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plate, E. J. (1971). The aerodynamics of shelter belts. Agricultural Meteorology 8, 203–222.Google Scholar
Raney, F. & Vaadia, Y. (1965). Movement and distribution of THO in tissue water and vapour transpired by shoots of Helianthus and Nicotiana. Plant Physiology, Lancaster 40, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spratt, E. D. & Gasser, J. K. R. (1970). Effect of ammonium and nitrate forms of nitrogen and restricted water supply on growth and nitrogen uptake of wheat. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 50, 263–273.Google Scholar
Stansell, J. R. & Sparrow, G. N. (1963). Rainfall controlled shelter for research plots. Agricultural Engineering 44, 318–319.Google Scholar
Szeicz, G. (1974). Solar radiation in crop canopies. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 1117–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teare, I. D., Schimmelpfennig, H. & Waldren, R. P. (1973). Rainout shelter and drainage lysimeters to quantitatively measure drought stress. Agronomy Journal 65, 544–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thom, A. S. (1972). Momentum, mass and heat exchange of vegetation. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 98, 124–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R. J. B. (1976). The chemical composition of rain, land drainage and borehole water from Rothamsted, Broom's Barn, Saxmundham, and Woburn Experimental Stations. In Agriculture and Water Quality. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Technical Bulletin no. 32, 174–200.Google Scholar
Williamson, R. E. & Van Schilfgaarde, J. (1965). Studies of crop response to drainage. II. Lysimeters. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers B, 98–102.Google Scholar