Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T17:47:43.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A quantitative evaluation of the comparative value of six fertilizer–nitrogen sources for potatoes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

K. Swaminathan
K. Swaminathan
Affiliation:
Central Potato Research Institute, Simla
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Six fertilizer–nitrogen sources, each at three levels, together with a control of no fertilizer–nitrogen were compared in field trials in two consecutive crop seasons on a sandy soil comparatively deficient in nitrogen at Patna, Bihar. Four mathematical models were fitted to the potato yield data in order to evaluate the relative availability indices of the individual fertilizers. Data collected on final stand and ‘emergence rate’ index (Bartlett) showed that while urea applications gave rise to a comparatively low speed of emergence, with observed shoot injuries, nitrate of soda caused poor final stands. The other fertilizers had no effect on either the final stand or the speed of emergence.

Sulphate of ammonia was chosen as the standard fertilizer for the present study. Ammonium sulphate nitrate was as good as or even slightly better, while ammonium chloride and calcium ammonium nitrate were of intermediate efficiency, in that order. Urea and nitrate of soda were decidedly poor as nitrogen sources for potatoes under the conditions of the study. The concurrent Mitscherlich curves model was found to represent the behaviour of these fertilizers with a good measure of fit.

The performance of the six fertilizers is discussed in the light of the availability of NH4+ and NO3-, the phytotoxicity of urea and nitrate of soda, and the harmful effects of Cl-. It is concluded that ammonium sulphate nitrate is the best carrier of nitrogen among those studied for potatoes under the conditions set forth.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , April 1972 , pp. 183 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon, (1957). Progress Report of the Scientific Work for the period from August 1949 to March 1956. Central Potato Research Institute, Simla.Google Scholar
Bh, Balmukand. (1928). Studies in crop variation. The relationship between yield and soil nutrients. J. agric. Sci. 18, 602–27.Google Scholar
Bardhan, M. K., Dargar, R. K. & Roy, A. K. (1965). On reduction of formation of unavailable phosphate in mixtures of superphosphate and calcium ammonium nitrate. Technol. 2, 244–5.Google Scholar
Bartlett, M. S. (1937). Some examples of statistical methods of research in agriculture and applied biology. Jl R. Statist. Soc. Suppl. 4, 1937.Google Scholar
Black, C. A. & Scott, C. O. (1956). Fertilizer evaluation. I. Fundamental principles. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 20, 176–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B. E., Owen, F. V. & Tobey, E. R. (1930). Source of nitrogen for potato fertilization in Aroostook county. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Stn. 354.Google Scholar
Bouldin, D. R. & Sample, E. C. (1959). Calcium phosphate fertilizers. III. The effect of surface area on the availability coefficient of dicalcium phosphates. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23, 276–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouldin, D. R., Dement, J. D. & Sample, E. C. (1960). Interaction between dicalcium and monoammonium phosphates granulated together. J. agric. Fd Chem. 8, 470–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chucka, J. A. (1943). Potato fertilizer-rotation studies in Aroostook farm, 1927–41. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Stn. 414.Google Scholar
Cooke, G. W. (1957). Field experiments on phosphate. A joint investigation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 74–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Court, M. N., Stephen, R. C. & Waid, J. S. (1962). Nitrite toxicity arising from the use of urea as a fertilizer. Nature 194 (4835): 1263–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowie, G. A. (1943). The relative responses of the potato crop to different potash fertilizers. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 1, 23–32.Google Scholar
Devine, J. R. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1963 a). Field experiments on the value of urea as a fertilizer for barley, sugar beet, potato, winter wheat and grassland in Great Britain. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60, 391–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devine, J. R. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1963 b). Field experiments comparing ammonium nitrate, sulphate of ammonia and urea applied respectively to grassland. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eid, M. T., Black, C. A., Kempthorne, O. & Zoeltner, J. A. (1954). Significance of soil organic phosphorus to plant growth. Bull. Ia agric. Exp. Stn. p. 406.Google Scholar
Feddersen, H. D. (1959). Nitrogenous fertilizers for potatoes. J. Agric. S. Aust. 62, 538–40.Google Scholar
Gausman, H. W. & Estes, G. O. (1960). Further report on the effect of chloride on potatoes. Me Fm Res. 8, (3), 10.Google Scholar
Gausman, H. W., Cooper, G. R. & Struchtemeyer, R. A. (1959). An indication that chloride affects the phosphate esters in potato tubers. Agron. J. 51, 750–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goralski, J., Baran, K. & Malezewski, Z. (1966). The fertilizing effeot of urea as affected by the biuret content. Soils Fertil. 29, 4225.Google Scholar
Goring, C. A. I. (1962). Control of nitrification of ammonium fertilizers and urea by 2-chloro-6 (trichloromethyl) pyridine. Soil Sci. 93, 431–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, T. D. & Welch, L. F. (1970). Potassium azide as nitrification inhibitor. Agron. J. 62, 595–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanwar, J. S., Meelu, O. P., Baweja, A. S. & Singh, R. (1963). Availability of phosphorus in fertilizer mixtures containing calcium ammonium nitrate. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 11, 101–10.Google Scholar
Kondrat'ev, I. G. & Podkolzina, G. V. (1967). Effect of granulated urea containing different amounts of biuret on yield of agricultural crops in field experiments. Soils Fertil. 30, 2116.Google Scholar
Leo, W. M., Odland, T. E. & Bell, R. S. (1959). Effect on soils and crops of long continued use of sulphate of ammonia and nitrate of soda with and without lime. Bull. Rhode Isl. agric. Exp. Stn. p. 344.Google Scholar
Lorenz, O. A. & Johnson, C. M. (1953). Nitrogen fertilization as related to the availability of phosphorus in certain California soils. Soil sci. 75, 119–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, P. G. (1967). Nitrogen losses from urea as affected by altering soil urease activity. Proc. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. 31, 380–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogata, T. & Yamada, R. (1959). Studies on the cause of the injurious effect of urea on germination and seedling growth. I. Decomposition of urea at high concentrations in soil. Soil Pl. Fd Tokyo 5, 41.Google Scholar
Ortumo, Martinez A., Gomez, Gomez J. & Canovas, Candel F. (1966). Nematocide activity of urea against Tylenchulus Semipenetrans cobb. sp. Soils Fertil. 31, 1319.Google Scholar
Panse, V. G. & Sukhatme, P. V. (1961). Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Parr, J. F. (1967). Biochemical considerations for increasing the efficiency of nitrogenous fertilizers. Soils Fertil. 30, 207–13.Google Scholar
SirRussell, E. J. & Garner, H. V. (1941). The Rothamsted experiments on the manuring of potatoes. Pt. II. Effect of inorganic and organic manures on the yield of potatoes. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 10, 217–26.Google Scholar
Terman, G. L., Bouldin, D. R. & Webb, J. R. (1962). Evaluation of fertilizers by biological methods. Adv. Agron. 14, 265–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, G. L., Hawkins, A., Cunningham, C. E. & Struchtemeyer, R. A. (1951). Rate, placement and source of nitrogen for potatoes in Maine. Bull. Me agric. Exp. Stn. 490.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. & Mack, W. B. (1944). The effect of different carriers of nitrogen on the nutrition of potatoes. Proc. Am. Soc. hort. Sci. 44, 346–54.Google Scholar
Tyler, K. B., Lorenz, O. A., Takatori, F. H. & Bishop, J. C. (1962). Urea nitrogen for potatoes. Am. Potato J. 39, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varma, S. & Mishra, N. P. (1965). Ammonia loss during storage of calcium ammonium nitrate. Technol. 2, 174–6.Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1959). Volatile loss of ammonia following surface application of urea to turf or bare soils. Agron. J. 51, 746–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. C. (1959). Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants. Evanston, Illinois: Row, Peterson and Company.Google Scholar
White, R. F., Kempthorne, O., Black, C. A. & Webb, J. R. (1956). Fertilizer evaluation. II. Estimation of the availability coefficients. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. 20, 179–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolcott, A. R., Foth, H. D. & Davis, J. F. (1965). Nitrogen carriers: I. Soil effects. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 29, 405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar