Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T18:23:06.252Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The inter-relationships of individual proteins and carbohydrates during fermentation in the rumen of the sheep. II. The fermentation of starch in the presence of proteins and other substances containing nitrogen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Lewis
D. Lewis
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. The inter-relationships of starch and proteins during fermentation in the rumen are measured by estimating volatile fatty acids, ammonia, lactic acid and amino acids after administering the starch and protein supplements alone or together.

2. The presence of casein stimulates the formation of volatile fatty acids from starch. Simpler nitrogen-containing compounds are less effective than casein; other proteins are as effective as casein provided they are fermented as rapidly in the rumen.

3. Proteins can be divided roughly into three groups on the basis of the rapidity with which they give rise to ammonia in the rumen: casein, gelatin, ground nut protein > soy protein, wheat gluten > bovine albumin, zein.

4. The proportion of acetic acid falls and of propionic acid and higher acids rises as proteins that are rapidly fermented are placed in the rumen.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 58 , Issue 1 , February 1962 , pp. 73 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Annison, E. F. (1954). Biochem. J. 57, 400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annison, E. F. (1956). Biochem. J. 64, 705.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F. & Lewis, D. (1959). Metabolism in the Rumen. 1st ed.London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bentley, O. G., Lehmkuhl, A., Johnson, R. R., Hershberger, T. V. & Moxon, A. L. (1954). J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 76, 500.Google Scholar
Bryant, M. P. & Doetsch, R. N. (1955). J. Dairy Sci. 38, 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burroughs, W., Arias, C., De Paul, P., Gerlaugh, P. & Bethke, R. M. (1951). J. Anim. Sci. 10, 672.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. (1960). In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant, pp. 205–25. Ed. Lewis, D.1st ed.London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
James, A. T. & Martin, A. J. P. (1952). Biochem. J. 50, 679.Google Scholar
Land, H. & Virtanen, A. I. (1959). Acta Chem. Scand. 13, 489.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1957). J. Agric. Sci. 48, 438.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. & McDonald, I. W. (1958). J. Agric. Sci. 51, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1948). Studies in the Metabolism of the Sheep with special reference to the Digestion of Protein. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
McDonald, I. W. (1952). Biochem. J. 51, 86.Google Scholar
Phillipson, A. T., Dobson, M. J. & Blackburn, T. H. (1958). Nature, Lond., 183, 402.Google Scholar