Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T12:45:08.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of modified circulating prolactin levels on seasonal wool growth in Romney ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. E. McCloghry
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
A. Foldes
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
A. J. Rintoul
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
C. A. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
D. E. Hollis
Affiliation:
Division of Animal Production, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
P. J. Baker
Affiliation:
ZIAPP Biometrics Unit, CSIRO, PO Box 239, Blacktown, NSW 2148, Australia
J. P. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Department of Wool and Animal Science, University of New South Wales, PO Box 1, Kensington, NSW 2033, Australia
P. C. Wynn
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia

Summary

The study investigated the effects of chronic elevation or suppression of circulating prolactin levels on seasonal wool growth in Romney sheep. Ewes (n = 10/group) were housed indoors under natural lighting (latitude 34 °S) and received either 50 mg bromocriptine i.m./ewe/28 days (Group B), 1 mg spiperone s.c./ewe/day (Group S) or no treatment (Group C) commencing in summer. Wool growth and liveweight were measured every 4 weeks and venous blood samples were collected for prolactin determination. Plasma prolactin levels (mean±s.E.) in Group C exhibited a gradual seasonal decline from 121±29 ng/ml to 35±9 ng/ml. Bromocriptine suppressed prolactin levels rapidly from a pretreatment value of 118±2 ng/ml to below 12±7 ng/ml for the duration of the study. Prolactin levels in Group S were not significantly higher than Group C, with the exception of the first 14 days following the initial treatment. A seasonal reduction in wool growth of c. 25% was observed in all groups; however, no significant treatment effect was evident. Mean liveweight of all animals increased from 50·4±0·8 to 56·8±0·7 kg during the study. These results indicate that perturbation of the annual cyclic secretion of prolactin does not affect wool growth in the Romney ewe.

Type
Animals
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allain, D., Ravault, J. P., Panaretto, B. A. & Rougeot, J. (1986). Effects of pinealectomy on photoperiodic control of hair follicle activity in the Limousine ram: possible relationships with plasma prolactin levels. Journal of Pineal Research 3, 2532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bubenik, G. A., Smith, P. S. & Schams, D. (1986). The effect of orally administered melatonin on the seasonality of deer pelage exchange, antler development, LH, FSH, prolactin, testosterone, T3, T4, cortisol, and alkaline phosphatase. Journal of Pineal Research 3, 331349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Curlewis, J. D., Sibbald, A. M., Milne, J. A.&McNeilly, A. S. (1991). Chronic treatment with long-acting bromocriptine does not affect duration of the breeding season, voluntary food intake, body weight, or wool growth in the Scottish Blackface ewe. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 3, 2533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deveson, S., Ardent, J. & Forsyth, I. A. (1989). Effect of melatonin (MT) treatment on coat growth cycles and prolactin (PRL) in goats. European Pineal Study Group 5, 142.Google Scholar
Dolling, M., McKinnon, L. & Fairclough, R. J. (1986). No effect of bromocriptine on wool growth in sheep. Proceedings of the Endocrine Society of Australia 29, 37.Google Scholar
Duncan, M.J. & Goldman, B. D. (1984). Hormonal regulation of the annual pelage colour in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus sungorus. II. Role of prolactin. Journal of Experimental Zoology 230, 97103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenhouse, S. W. & Giesser, S. (1959). Methods in the analysis of profile data. Journal of Educational Statistics 1, 6982.Google Scholar
Lincoln, G. A. (1990 a). Significance of seasonal cycles in prolactin secretion in male mammals. Perspectives in Andrology 53, 299306.Google Scholar
Lincoln, G. A. (1990 b). Correlation with changes in horns and pelage, but not reproduction, of seasonal cycles in the secretion of prolactin in rams of wild, feral and domesticated breeds of sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 90, 285296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lincoln, G. A. & Ebling, F. J. P. (1985). Effect of constantrelease implants of melatonin on seasonal cycles in reproduction, prolactin secretion and moulting in rams. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 73, 241253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loudon, A. S. I., Milne, J. A., Curlewis, J. D. & McNeilly, A. S. (1989). A comparison of the seasonal hormone changes and patterns of growth, voluntary food intake and reproduction in juvenile and adult red deer (Cervus elaphus) and Père David's deer (Elaphurus davidianus) hinds. Journal of Endocrinology 122, 733745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, L., Allain, D. & Meunier, M. (1983). Regulation in pregnant mink (Mustela vison) of plasma progesterone and prolactin concentrations and regulation of onset of the spring moult by daylight ratio and melatonin injections. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61, 19591963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, L., Allain, D. & Weiner, C. (1984). Role of prolactin in the photoperiodic control of moulting in the mink (Mustela vison). Journal of Endocrinology 103, 915.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maxwell, C. A., Rintoul, A. J., Foldes, A., Downing, J. A., Scaramuzzi, R. J. & Carter, N. B. (1989). Seasonal modification of ovine pineal function. 2. Steroidal effects on melatonin and prolactin profiles. Neuroendocrinology 50, 274279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morris, L. R. (1961). Photoperiodicity of seasonal rhythm of wool growth in sheep. Nature 190, 102103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reis, P. J. (1967). The growth and composition of wool. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 20, 809825.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rose, J., Stormshak, F., Oldfield, J. & Adair, J. (1985). The effect of photoperiod and melatonin on serum prolactin levels of the mink during the autumn moult. Journal of Pineal Research 2, 1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, J., Oldfield, J. & Stormshak, F. (1987). Apparent role of melatonin and prolactin in initiating winter fur growth in mink. General and Comparative Endocrinology 65, 212215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, A. J., Mondain-Monval, M., Anderson Berg, K., Simon, P., Forsberg, M., Clausen, O. P. F., Hansen, T., Møller, O. M. & Scholler, R. (1987). Effects of melatonin implantation on spermatogenesis, the moulting cycle and plasma concentrations of melatonin, LH, prolactin and testosterone in the male blue fox (Alopex lagopus). Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 79, 379390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, J. R. & Barrell, G. K. (1985). Advancement of reproductive activity, seasonal reduction in prolactin secretion and seasonal pelage changes in pubertal red deer hinds (Cervus elaphus) subjected to artificially shortened daily photoperiod or daily melatonin treatments. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 73, 255260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed