Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T10:11:22.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effects of bitumen mulch and sowing date on the establishment and yield of oil-seed sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Harper
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG
R. C. Ferguson
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG

Summary

Experiments in 1976 and 1977, in south-east Scotland, with sunflower (cv. Fransol) examined the effects of bitumen mulch applied after sowing, date and depth of sowing on emergence, flowering and yield. Bitumen mulch increased soil temperatures in April and May by 1–4·5 °C resulting in earlier emergence (6–7 days), more complete emergence under adverse conditions of early and deep sowing, and earlier flowering (2–5 days). Delaying sowing from 7 April to 5 May reduced emergence time and time from sowing to first anthesis. Larger seedlings, having an increased leaf area, resulted from bitumen mulching and early sowing.

In the laboratory, increasing temperatures from 5 to 20 °C reduced the average germination time by 0·75 days for each increase of 5 °C. Germination percentage was not affected by temperature over this range.

Average seed yields and oil content were markedly different in 1976 and 1977; 2·22 t/ha and 44·7% for 1976 and 0·95 t/ha and 36·9% for 1977. Bitumen mulch and sowing depth had no effect on seed yield or oil content but delaying sowing until 5 May reduced both. Lower seed yields in 1977 resulted from fewer and smaller seeds. Infection of the seed heads with grey mould (Botrytis cinerea) after flowering was high in both years.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1949). Sunflowers as a seed crop. Advisory Leaflet of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, No. 311.Google Scholar
Austin, B. B. & Jones, H. G. (1974). The physiology of wheat. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, pp. 2073.Google Scholar
Blackman, G. E. (1946). The cultivation and harvesting of sunflowers. Journal of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries 53, 2733.Google Scholar
Bremner, P. M. & Taha, M. A. (1966). Studies in potato agronomy. I. The effects of variety, seed size nd spacing on growth, development and yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 66, 241252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1973). Minor crops-sunflower. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, pp. 105106.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1974 a). New arable crops–retrospects and prospects. Journal of the Royal Agricultural Society of England 135, 107121.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1974 b). Minor crops-sunflower. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, p. 99.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1975). Minor crops-sunflower. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, p. 83.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1976 a). The potential of minor field crops in British agriculture. Proceedings of 1976 British Crop Protection Conference, pp. 947953.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1976 b). New crops-sunflowers. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, pp. 6768.Google Scholar
Bunting, E. S. (1977). New crops-sunflowers. Report of Plant Breeding Institute, Cambridge, p. 81.Google Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. (1973). Effects of total solar radiation and temperature on vegetative growth in the east of Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology 10, 145156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. L. (1967). Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. XIII. A comparison of the effect of seasonal variation in light energy and temperature on the growth of Helianthus annuus and Vicia faba in the vegetative phase. Annals of Botany 31, 291308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, E. F. (1944). Sunflower for Food, Fodder and Fertility. London: Faber and Faber Ltd.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. & Sampson, A. J. (1967). Effect of bitumen mulching on soil conditions. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 18, 486491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J. F. & Fick, G. N. (1978). Influence of plant population on performance of sunflower hybrids. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 58, 597600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osafo, D. M. & Milbourn, G. M. (1975). The growth of maize. III. The effect of date of sowing and bitumen mulch on dry matter yields. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 271279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragg, J. H. & Futty, D. W. (1967). The soils of the country around Haddington and Eyemouth. Memoir of the Soil Survey of Great Britain, pp. 9799. H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. G. (1971). Sunflower phenology-year, variety and date of planting effects on day and growing degree-day summations. Crop Science 11, 635638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R. G. (1975). Amino acid and elemental composition of sunflower and pumpkin seeds. Agronomy Journal 67, 541544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollier, M. (1970). The variety of factors which affect the quantity and quality of sunflower proteins. Proceedings of the 4th International Sunflower Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, pp. 211214.Google Scholar
Sale, P. J. M. (1966 a). Effect of petroleum mulch on seedling emergence, soil moisture and soil temperature. Experimental Horticulture 14, 4352.Google Scholar
Sale, P. J. M. (1966 b). Effect of a petroleum mulch on the marketable yield of some vegetable crops. Experimental Horticulture 14, 5361.Google Scholar