Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T00:18:51.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of sire breed on the partitioning of dissectible fat in steer carcasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. M. Thompson  and
R. Barlow
J. M. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Trangie, N.S.W., Australia
R. Barlow
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Grafton, N.S.W., Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Differences in the partitioning of fat in the carcass may affect ‘carcass quality’ and depending upon the particular market requirements the optimum partitioning of fat may vary. Differences in fat partitioning may also affect the accuracy with which total carcass fat can be predicted from an assessment of subcutaneous fat (Pomeroy & Williams, 1974).

Type
Short Note
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , June 1981 , pp. 699 - 701
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1966). Report of a Major Beef Research Project. The Royal Smithfield Club.Google Scholar
Barlow, R. & O'Neill, G. (1978). Performance of Hereford and crossbred Hereford cattle in the subtropics of New South Wales: growth of first cross calves to weaning. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 1313–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, R. T. & Butterfield, R. M. (1976). New Concepts of Cattle Growth. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1965). Praotical implications of anatomical research in beef cattle. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 25, 152–163.Google Scholar
Callow, E. H. (1961). Comparative studies of meat. VII. A comparison between Hereford Dairy Shorthorn and Friesian steers on four levels of nutrition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempster, A. J., Cuthbertson, A. & Harrington, G. (1976). Fat distribution in steer carcases of different breeds and crosses. I. Distribution between depots. Animal Production 23, 25–34.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. W. & Williams, D. R. (1974). The partition of fat in the bovine carcase. Proceedings of British Society of Animal Production (New Series) 3, 85 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Thompson, J. M. & Barlow, R. (1981). Growth and carcase characteristics of crossbred and straightbred Hereford steers. II. Carcase measurements and composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. M., Barlow, R., Johnston, B. & Nicholls, P. J. (1981). Growth and carcase characteristics of crossbred and straightbred Hereford steers. I. Postweaning growth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 161–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar