Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T13:31:41.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of imposed light rhythms on semen production of Suffolk rams

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. Jackson ,
H. LL. Williams ,
G. Jackson  and
H. LL. Williams
G. Jackson
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Animal Husbandry and Hygiene, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire
H. LL. Williams
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Animal Husbandry and Hygiene, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire
G. Jackson
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Animal Husbandry and Hygiene, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire
H. LL. Williams
Affiliation:
The Royal Veterinary College, Department of Animal Husbandry and Hygiene, Boltons Park, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of two, symmetrically opposing, light treatments on the semen of Suffolk rams were investigated over two years. The light rhythm had an amplitude of 12 h and a cycle of 24 weeks. Data on semen volume, spermatozoa concentration, total spermatozoa per ejaculate, fructose concentration, seminal fluid fructose concentration and total fructose were collected during 38 semen collection periods. During the last 20 periods libido was assessed on the interval to mounting.

The effects of treatments were assessed by fitting Fourier curves with 24-week cycles to the observed fluctuation of the differences between treatments and with 52-week cycles to the means of treatments. From periodic regression analysis of the treatment differences it is concluded that the Suffolk rams were susceptible to the artificial light rhythms and that both groups adapted to the imposed rhythms. Some effects of the pretreatment photic environment appeared to persist during the first year of the treatment period. There appeared to be a lag between the fluctuations of the semen attributes resulting in a series of sequential changes.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 1 , August 1973 , pp. 179 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaty, T. & Williams, H. LL. (1971 a). The reproductive performance of British breeds of sheep in an equatorial environment. I. Mountain breeds. Br. vet. 127, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, T. & Williams, H. LL. (1971 b). Tho reproductive performance of British breeds of sheep in an equatorial environment. II. Lowland broods. Br. vet. J. 127, 10–19.Google Scholar
Bielanski, W. T. & Tischner, M. (1968). Transport of spermatozoa from the epididymis to the urethra in rams. VI Int Oongr. Anim. Reprod. A.1 (Paris) 1, 39–41.Google Scholar
Bliss, C. I. (1958). Periodic regression in biology and climatology. Bull. Conn, agric. Exp. Stn, no. 615, 56 pp.Google Scholar
Jackson, G. (1972). Observations on the seasonal variation in reproductive activity of sheep. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Mann, T. (1948). Fructose content and fructolysis in semen. Practical application in the evaluation of semen quality. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 38, 323–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, T. (1969). Physiology of semen and of the male reproductive tract. In Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 2nd ed. (ed. Cole, H. H. and Cupps, P. T.), pp. 277. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauléon, P. & Rougeot, J. (1962). Regulation des saisons sexuelles chez des brebis de races differentes au moyen de divers rythmos luminex. Ann. Biol. Anim. Biochim. Biophys. 2, 209–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moule, G. R., Braden, A. H. W. & Mattner, P. E. (1966). Effects of season, nutrition and hormone treatment on the fructose content of ram semen. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 17, 923–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menaker, M. & Eskin, A. (1968). Biological rhythms. In Adaptation of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.). Philadelphia: Lea and Fibiger.Google Scholar
Ortavant, R., Mauléon, P. & Thibault, C. (1964). Photoperiodic control of gonadal and hypophyseal activity in domestic animals. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 117, 157–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sollberger, A. (1970). Problems in tho statistical analysis of short periodic time series. J. interdiscipl. Cycle Res. 1, 49–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibault, C., Courot, M., Martinet, L., Mauléon, P., Du Mesnil Du Buisson, F., Ortavant, R., Pelletier, J. & Signoret, J. P. (1966). Regulation of breeding season and oestrous cycles by light and external stimuli in somo mammals. J. Anim. Sci. 25, suppl. 119–139.Google Scholar
Thwaites, C. J. (1965). Photoperiodio control of breeding activity in the Southdown ewe with particular reference to the effects of an equatorial light regime. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 65, 57–64.Google Scholar
Tischner, M. (1968). Cyclicity in spermatozoa transport through a fistulated vas deferens in the ram. Acta biol. cracov. Ser. Zool. 10, 283–8.Google Scholar
Williams, H. Ll. (1970). The photoperiodicity of British ewes. Span 13, 1–3.Google Scholar
Williams, H. Ll. (1972). The interaction of genotype and environment on the reproductive performance of sheep. VII Int. Congr. Anim. Eeprod. A. 1 (Munich) (in the Press).Google Scholar
Williams, H. Ll. & Laing, J. A. (1971). The fertility of housed sheep with special reference to photostimulation. Atti V. Simp. int. Zootec. (Milano, 1970), pp. 379–82.Google Scholar
Yeates, N. T. M. (1949). The breeding season of the sheep with particular reference to its modification by artificial means using light. J. agric. Sci., Comb. 39, 1–42.Google Scholar